Back

Learning to localize sounds like a barn owl

Bremen, P.; van der Willigen, R. F.; Van Opstal, A. J.; van Wanrooij, M. M.

2026-02-06 neuroscience
10.64898/2026.02.06.704341 bioRxiv
Show abstract

The brain computes sound location from auditory spatial cues. Humans and barn owls can localize sounds with high accuracy, yet they rely on fundamentally different cue configurations shaped by their ear anatomy and neural circuitry. In humans, symmetrical ears provide interaural time and level differences for horizontal localization, while vertical localization depends primarily on high-frequency, monaural spectral cues generated by the pinnae. Barn owls, by contrast, possess asymmetrical ears and use binaural cues to localize sounds in both azimuth and elevation. Because auditory pathways are assumed to be tuned to the statistics of species-specific cues, it remains unclear whether humans can localize sounds using barn-owl-like spatial information. We addressed this by fitting human listeners with asymmetric ear molds that disrupted normal spectral cues and introduced elevation-dependent interaural level differences, while preserving interaural time differences. Participants wore the molds during daily life and were tested on sound localization using broadband, high-pass, and low-pass noise. Acute exposure to the molds severely degraded elevation localization, while horizontal localization remained largely unaffected. With prolonged exposure, elevation localization improved, but adaptation was limited. Crucially, improvement was strongest for broadband sounds. Because broadband sounds uniquely provide access to both low-frequency interaural time differences and high-frequency interaural level differences, this pattern indicates that listeners learned to use binaural cues to infer sound elevation. These findings demonstrate that the human auditory system can partially adapt to extreme barn-owl-like outer-ear acoustics. Binaural cues can be repurposed to support elevation localization, with effective learning requiring access to complementary spatial cues. Conceptual takeawayGive humans asymmetric barn-owl ears and they can learn to use them - but only partially. The auditory brain is flexible enough to reinterpret new ear shapes, yet is strongly constrained in how far it can relearn a fundamentally different auditory space.

Matching journals

The top 2 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America
35 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
31.7%
2
Trends in Hearing
15 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
18.9%
50% of probability mass above
3
The Journal of Neuroscience
1025 papers in training set
Top 2%
6.9%
4
eLife
5828 papers in training set
Top 20%
5.6%
5
Scientific Reports
3612 papers in training set
Top 25%
4.1%
6
Frontiers in Neuroscience
256 papers in training set
Top 1%
3.6%
7
Hearing Research
54 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
3.2%
8
Journal of the Association for Research in Otolaryngology
15 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
2.8%
9
eneuro
439 papers in training set
Top 3%
2.7%
10
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
2444 papers in training set
Top 21%
2.4%
11
Journal of Neurophysiology
302 papers in training set
Top 2%
2.4%
12
NeuroImage
903 papers in training set
Top 5%
1.5%
13
PLOS ONE
5266 papers in training set
Top 52%
1.4%
14
iScience
1154 papers in training set
Top 24%
1.2%
15
PLOS Computational Biology
1863 papers in training set
Top 18%
1.1%
16
Behavior Research Methods
30 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
0.9%
17
Current Biology
665 papers in training set
Top 11%
0.6%
18
Cognition
47 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
0.6%
19
Communications Biology
993 papers in training set
Top 33%
0.6%
20
npj Science of Learning
19 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
0.6%
21
Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences
393 papers in training set
Top 6%
0.6%