Back

Directional variation and method-specific detection patterns in offshore bat migration: implications for wind farm mitigation

Lagerveld, S.; de Vries, P.; Rakhimberdiev, E.; Harris, J.; Noort, B. C. A.; Geelhoed, S. C. V.; Van Langevelde, F.; Mathews, F.; Poot, M.; Karagicheva, J.

2026-02-07 ecology
10.64898/2026.02.06.704313 bioRxiv
Show abstract

O_LICurtailment of wind farms effectively reduces collision mortality in bats. Implementing this measure in offshore wind farms requires knowledge on the spatiotemporal occurrence and environmental predictors of migration over sea. In bats, such information can be obtained through acoustic monitoring and individual tracking. However, these techniques provide seemingly contradictory insights into migration patterns. C_LIO_LIWe used a Bayesian capture-recapture state-space model to investigate how environmental predictors influence spring departure decisions of Nathusius pipistrelle Pipistrellus nathusii migrating over the North Sea. The model was applied to both acoustic and tracking data, enabling comparable analyses across methods and incorporating uncertainty in migration dates of tracked bats. Additionally, we examined nightly offshore bat occurrence to further explore differences in movement patterns detected by the two techniques. C_LIO_LIWind conditions at 200 m above sea level were identified as key driver of Nathusius pipistrelle spring migration. In May-June, most bats migrated from the United Kingdom under westerly and northwesterly tailwinds. Tracked individuals flew in stronger supportive winds than acoustically recorded bats, which were also detected under crosswinds and headwinds. In March-April, acoustic detections occurred mainly during strong southerly winds, suggesting that early-season migrants largely consisted of individuals migrating over the European mainland and drifted northwards onto the North Sea by strong crosswinds. C_LIO_LIAcoustic detectors primarily recorded bats that landed on offshore platforms, likely because they were unable to cross the North Sea in a single flight due to less favorable wind conditions, or because they departed from more inland locations. In contrast, tracking data mainly represented bats that successfully crossed the North Sea in a non-stop flight under moderate supportive tailwinds. C_LIO_LISynthesis and applications: Combining observation techniques improves our understanding of bat migration patterns. Additionally, acoustic monitoring can capture migration from different geographic origins. Current mitigation measures for offshore wind farms at the North Sea rely solely on acoustic data, likely overlooking the part of the population that crosses over sea with optimal wind support. Acoustic and tracking data are therefore complementary rather than contradictory, and both methods should be used together when developing mitigation measures. C_LI

Matching journals

The top 6 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Movement Ecology
18 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
18.3%
2
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 16%
12.1%
3
Methods in Ecology and Evolution
160 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
6.2%
4
Ecological Applications
28 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
6.2%
5
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 20%
6.2%
6
Journal of The Royal Society Interface
189 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
4.2%
50% of probability mass above
7
Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B
51 papers in training set
Top 1%
3.5%
8
Ecosphere
53 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
3.5%
9
PeerJ
261 papers in training set
Top 3%
3.0%
10
Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences
341 papers in training set
Top 3%
2.8%
11
Global Ecology and Conservation
25 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
2.0%
12
eLife
5422 papers in training set
Top 36%
2.0%
13
Frontiers in Ecology and Evolution
60 papers in training set
Top 2%
2.0%
14
Journal of Applied Ecology
35 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
1.7%
15
PLOS Computational Biology
1633 papers in training set
Top 15%
1.7%
16
Remote Sensing in Ecology and Conservation
10 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.5%
17
Frontiers in Marine Science
55 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
1.3%
18
Environmental Pollution
35 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.2%
19
Nature Communications
4913 papers in training set
Top 59%
0.9%
20
Journal of Animal Ecology
63 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
0.9%
21
Ecological Informatics
29 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
0.7%
22
Preventive Veterinary Medicine
14 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
0.7%
23
Peer Community Journal
254 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.7%
24
Ecology and Evolution
232 papers in training set
Top 5%
0.6%
25
Epidemics
104 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.6%
26
Ibis
11 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
0.6%