Back

Deep Learning-Based Automated Echocardiographic Measurements in Pediatric and Congenital Heart Disease

Lukyanenko, P.; Ghelani, S. J.; Yang, Y.; Jiang, B.; Miller, T.; Higgins, P.; Kirakosian, M.; Tracy, K.; Kane, J.; Harrild, D. M.; Triedman, J.; Powell, A.; Geva, T.; La Cava, W.; Mayourian, J.

2026-02-09 cardiovascular medicine
10.64898/2026.02.06.26345782 medRxiv
Show abstract

BackgroundEchocardiography (echo) is a cornerstone of pediatric cardiology, yet access to expert interpreters is limited worldwide, particularly in low-resource and rural settings. Artificial intelligence (AI) offers a mechanism to broadly deliver expert-level precision and standardize measurements, yet AI for comprehensive automated measurements in pediatric and congenital heart disease (CHD) echo remains underdeveloped. MethodsWe created EchoFocus-Measure, an AI platform that automatically extracts 18 quantitative parameters and 10 qualitative assessments from full echo studies. The method extends a multi-task, view-agnostic architecture (PanEcho) with a study-level transformer to prioritize diagnostically informative views. Training (80%) and internal testing (20%) were performed on echos from Boston Childrens Hospital (BCH), with external evaluation on outside referral studies. Left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) was the primary endpoint. ResultsThe internal cohort included 11.4 million videos from 217,435 echos (60,269 patients; median age 8.5 years; median LVEF 61%), and external validation encompassed 289,613 videos from 3,096 echos (2,506 patients; median age 3.5 years; median LVEF 62%). For LVEF, EchoFocus-Measure exhibited a median absolute error (MAE) of 2.8% internally and 3.8% externally, maintaining accuracy across infants (MAE 3.2%) and complex CHD lesions (e.g., MAE 4.0% for L-loop transposition of the great arteries). EchoFocus-Measure improved upon the PanEcho benchmark (MAE 7.5% for infants; 13.1% for L-loop transposition). Discrepant case (>50th percentile error) adjudication of LVEF demonstrated that model errors (MAE 2.4%) were within human variability (MAE 3.7%). For qualitative measures, EchoFocus-Measure performed well internally (AUROC 0.88-0.95) and modestly externally (AUROC 0.73-0.86). Explainability analyses highlighted model focus on clinically appropriate echo views for LVEF estimation (apical four-chamber, parasternal short/long) and mitral regurgitation assessment (apical four-chamber color Doppler, parasternal short/long color Doppler). ConclusionsEchoFocus-Measure delivers rapid and reliable automated echo measurements across ages and lesions within diverse internal and real-world external cohorts, serving as a step toward scalable, global access to high-quality pediatric cardiovascular care.

Matching journals

The top 6 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
European Heart Journal - Digital Health
15 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
23.1%
2
Circulation
66 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
13.0%
3
Circulation: Genomic and Precision Medicine
42 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
5.0%
4
Journal of the American Heart Association
119 papers in training set
Top 2%
4.3%
5
The American Journal of Cardiology
15 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
4.1%
6
Frontiers in Cardiovascular Medicine
49 papers in training set
Top 1.0%
3.7%
50% of probability mass above
7
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 38%
3.7%
8
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 34%
3.7%
9
npj Digital Medicine
97 papers in training set
Top 1%
3.7%
10
European Heart Journal
16 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
3.2%
11
Journal of the American College of Cardiology
12 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
2.7%
12
Computers in Biology and Medicine
120 papers in training set
Top 1%
2.2%
13
Journal of Clinical Medicine
91 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.8%
14
Annals of Biomedical Engineering
34 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
1.5%
15
Heart
10 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
1.5%
16
Critical Care Explorations
15 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
1.3%
17
Nature Medicine
117 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.9%
18
JACC: Clinical Electrophysiology
11 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
0.9%
19
Frontiers in Physiology
93 papers in training set
Top 5%
0.9%
20
Nature Cardiovascular Research
28 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
0.9%
21
Nature Communications
4913 papers in training set
Top 60%
0.8%
22
PLOS Digital Health
91 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.8%
23
BMC Medicine
163 papers in training set
Top 7%
0.8%
24
American Journal of Physiology-Heart and Circulatory Physiology
32 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.7%
25
Physiological Measurement
12 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
0.7%
26
BMJ Health & Care Informatics
13 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.5%
27
eLife
5422 papers in training set
Top 63%
0.5%
28
The Lancet Digital Health
25 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.5%