Back

GALEAS™ Bladder Demonstrates High Sensitivity and Specificity for Detecting Bladder Cancer: Real-World Multicentre Data from UK NHS Haematuria Clinics

Silcock, L.; Hastings, R. K.; Clokie, S.; Sadler, R.; Parks, M.; Smith, M.; Hewitt, V.; Douglas-Moore, J. L.; Wignall, H.; Escabelado, H.; Piedad, J.; Kanabar, S.; Blick, C.; Mohee, A.; Pumfrey, N.; Coull, N.; Goffe, A.; Tippett, R.; Laird, A.; Shah, C. P.; MacKay, M.; Owen, C.; Mufti, U.; Ward, D. G.; Bryan, R. T.

2026-02-09 oncology
10.64898/2026.02.06.26345752 medRxiv
Show abstract

BackgroundCystoscopy is a core component of haematuria investigations but is invasive and resource-intensive. GALEAS Bladder is a DNA-based diagnostic urine test that measures alterations in 23 bladder cancer-associated genes. ObjectiveTo assess the diagnostic performance and clinical utility of GALEAS Bladder as a molecular triage tool in real-world haematuria investigation pathways. MethodsPatients referred for urgent investigation of haematuria were prospectively enrolled across seven UK NHS Urology Departments between October 2024 and June 2025. Urine samples were collected prior to cystoscopy and analysed using the GALEAS Bladder assay (Nonacus Clinical Services, UK). Assay results were compared with cystoscopy findings. Key Findings and LimitationsCystoscopic findings and GALEAS Bladder results were available for 964 participants, including 77 (8.0%) newly-diagnosed with pathology-confirmed BC. The assay demonstrated an overall sensitivity of 92.2% (95% CI: 84.0-96.4%), specificity of 92.0% (95% CI: 90.0-93.6%), and negative predictive value (NPV) of 99.3% (95% CI: 98.4-99.7%) for the diagnosis of BC. For the diagnosis of high-grade BCs, sensitivity was 97.2% (95% CI: 85.8-99.5%) with an NPV of 99.9% (95% CI:99.3-100.0%). Limitations include an absence of subsequent diagnoses for participants with positive GALEAS Bladder test results in the absence of cystoscopically-visible tumour. Conclusions and Clinical ImplicationsGALEAS Bladder is a clinically implementable molecular urine test with very high sensitivity and specificity for the diagnosis of new cases of BC in patients undergoing urgent investigation of haematuria, especially for high-grade BCs. Clinical adoption could permit the molecular triage of haematuria patients to immediate or deferred cystoscopy.

Matching journals

The top 5 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
British Journal of Cancer
42 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
22.8%
2
BMC Medicine
163 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
10.6%
3
Nature Communications
4913 papers in training set
Top 17%
10.2%
4
PLOS Medicine
98 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
6.4%
5
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 31%
4.9%
50% of probability mass above
6
BMJ Open
554 papers in training set
Top 4%
4.6%
7
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 27%
4.4%
8
EClinicalMedicine
21 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.9%
9
Journal of Clinical Investigation
164 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.8%
10
Frontiers in Oncology
95 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.7%
11
The Journal of Clinical Endocrinology & Metabolism
35 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
1.3%
12
Cancer Epidemiology, Biomarkers & Prevention
17 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
1.3%
13
Clinical Cancer Research
58 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.2%
14
Kidney360
22 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
1.1%
15
Wellcome Open Research
57 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.1%
16
International Journal of Cancer
42 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.8%
17
Thorax
32 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
0.8%
18
The Journal of Infectious Diseases
182 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.8%
19
PLOS Digital Health
91 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.8%
20
Clinical Chemistry
22 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
0.8%
21
JAMA Network Open
127 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.8%
22
Kidney International
25 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
0.8%
23
Diagnostics
48 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.8%
24
Cell Reports Medicine
140 papers in training set
Top 9%
0.7%
25
eLife
5422 papers in training set
Top 61%
0.7%
26
Cancers
200 papers in training set
Top 6%
0.5%
27
British Journal of General Practice
22 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
0.5%
28
Interface Focus
14 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
0.5%
29
Journal of Infection
71 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.5%
30
Annals of Oncology
13 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.5%