Back

Emergency Physician Ultrasound-guided Nerve Block Training Simulation Assessment: a Prospective Cohort Study

Mercader, D.; Lerebours, R.; Staton, C. A.; Peethumnongsin, E.; Kuchibhatla, M.; Theophanous, R. G.

2026-02-11 emergency medicine
10.64898/2026.02.06.26345652 medRxiv
Show abstract

BackgroundStandardized training and competency testing is needed for appropriate point-of-care ultrasound (POCUS) clinical use. Our study objective assesses a low-fidelity simulation pig model workshop and tests the knowledge and technical skills of emergency medicine (EM) clinicians when performing simulated ultrasound-guided serratus anterior nerve block (UG-SANB). MethodsEM residents, attendings, and advanced practice providers (APP) participated in a prospective cohort study, completing a one-time simulation-based UG-NB training session at a single academic medical center between November 2024 to February 2025. Training model acceptability, appropriateness, and feasibility was assessed using the validated AIM-IAM-FIM tool (pre/post-surveys). Effectiveness outcomes were participant knowledge score, technical skill score, and self-rated confidence in performing NBs pre-, post-, and 3-months post-intervention. Clinical ED-performed ultrasound-guided nerve blocks were reported pre-/post-intervention. Scores were summarized using mean (S.D.) and total question percent correct. Paired individual assessments were compared pre/post-intervention using paired t-tests and group assessments using t-tests for normal data distribution. Results63/104 ED providers (60.6%) responded to surveys pre-intervention and 57 post-intervention (54.8%). 63 providers (16 EM attendings, 33 residents, and 14 APPs) underwent SANB training and testing. Participant survey responses reported the training model was acceptable, appropriate, and feasible (at least 54/57 agreed or strongly agreed for all three). Mean knowledge scores were 85% (SD 14.8%) post- and 70% (SD 18.2%) 3-months post-workshop. Mean technical skills exam scores were 98% (SD 4.5%) post- and 95% (5.8%) 3-months post-intervention. Perceived confidence in teaching clinical NBs increased pre-/post-intervention (from 11.3% to 58.2%) and for SANB (3.2% to 70.2%). Clinically performed NBs at pre and post were 21 and 15 respectively. ConclusionEmergency clinicians knowledge, technical skills, and confidence scores increased after an UG-NB training intervention. This standardized, reproducible simulation model could improve clinical skills and patient care outcomes but needs additional steps to increase clinical UG-NB performance.

Matching journals

The top 4 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Emergency Medicine Journal
20 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
23.4%
2
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 8%
19.4%
3
Journal of General Internal Medicine
20 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
7.1%
4
CMAJ Open
12 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
5.0%
50% of probability mass above
5
BMJ Open
554 papers in training set
Top 4%
5.0%
6
BMC Health Services Research
42 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
3.8%
7
BMC Medical Education
20 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
2.7%
8
JMIR Formative Research
32 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
2.7%
9
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 47%
2.5%
10
Cureus
67 papers in training set
Top 2%
2.2%
11
Frontiers in Neurology
91 papers in training set
Top 2%
2.0%
12
PLOS Global Public Health
293 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.9%
13
JAMA Network Open
127 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.8%
14
Journal of Clinical Investigation
164 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.8%
15
Frontiers in Public Health
140 papers in training set
Top 4%
1.7%
16
Frontiers in Medicine
113 papers in training set
Top 5%
1.0%
17
Annals of Translational Medicine
17 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.8%
18
Medicine
30 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.7%
19
Journal of Medical Internet Research
85 papers in training set
Top 5%
0.7%
20
Journal of the American Heart Association
119 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.5%
21
Diagnostic Microbiology and Infectious Disease
21 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
0.5%