Back

Viral Co-infection in COVID-19: Prevalence and Clinical Associations of Human Pegivirus

Garand, M.; Zhang, C. C.; Guo, G.; Kirti, P.; Stapleton, J.; Eghtesady, P.

2026-02-09 infectious diseases
10.64898/2026.02.06.26344215 medRxiv
Show abstract

ObjectiveThis study investigates the prevalence of human pegivirus (HPgV) in SARS-CoV-2-positive patients within the context of viral co-infections that may modulate COVID-19 outcomes and assesses whether HPgV co-infection is associated with COVID-19 severity. HPgV is a widely circulating but rarely monitored human virus with documented immunomodulatory effects in other viral infections, including HIV and Ebola. While HPgV prevalence is low in the general U.S. population (1-2%), it rises markedly in the setting of chronic viral co-infections, particularly HIV (15-40%). Given its immunologic effects and persistence, HPgV represents a biologically plausible but unexplored viral co-factor SARS-CoV-2 infection. MethodsWe analyzed four cohorts: SARS-CoV-2-positive individuals, ICU patients with respiratory symptoms but SARS-CoV-2-negative, HIV-positive individuals as a positive control for HPgV detection, and uninfected controls. ResultsHPgV prevalence in COVID-19 patients was low (2.1%) and comparable to population estimates. As expected, HPgV prevalence was substantially higher in the HIV cohort (34%), validating assay performance and cohort stratification. Among HPgV-positive COVID-19 cases, most experienced mild disease, with directional trends toward reduced severity despite high baseline risk factors. Healthcare workers in the control group showed unexpectedly elevated HPgV prevalence (9.6%). ConclusionsHPgV is an unmonitored but widely circulating viral co-infection in humans that may influence host responses to SARS-CoV-2. Although limited by small numbers, our findings support further investigation of HPgV and other immunomodulatory viral co-infections in COVID-19. This study suggests that HPgV co-infection may influence COVID-19 outcomes, warranting further investigation. HighlightsO_LISystematic screening of human pegivirus (HPgV), an unmonitored viral co-infection, in COVID-19 (n = 634). C_LIO_LIHPgV prevalence in COVID-19 mirrored population estimates but was markedly enriched in HIV (positive control). C_LIO_LIHPgV-positive COVID-19 cases showed trends toward milder clinical outcomes. C_LIO_LIFindings highlight the potential relevance of immunomodulatory viral co-infections in SARS-CoV-2 infection. C_LI Executive SummaryThis study evaluated the prevalence of human pegivirus (HPgV) co-infection among SARS-CoV-2-positive patients as part of a broader effort to understand how concurrent viral infections may influence COVID-19 severity. HPgV is a largely unmonitored, persistent human virus with well-described immunomodulatory effects in other viral infections, yet it has not been systematically evaluated in COVID-19. We therefore screened HPgV prevalence across COVID-19 cases, comparator cohorts, and an HIV-positive cohort as a positive control due to the well-established high prevalence of HPgV in HIV infection. Our findings indicate that HPgV prevalence in SARS-CoV-2-positive and -negative hospitalized individuals are consistent with the general U.S. population range (approximately 1-5%). Healthcare professionals exhibited a higher HPgV prevalence ([~]10%), suggesting that repeated occupational viral exposures may influence infection rates. While limited by small numbers, HPgV co-infection in COVID-19 cases was associated with directional trends toward reduced disease severity, warranting further longitudinal and mechanistic investigation. Editors summaryThis study identifies human pegivirus as a widely circulating, unmonitored viral co-infection in COVID-19 with potential relevance to disease severity.

Published in Next Research · not in our set (fewer than 10 published preprints to learn from) · training set

Matching journals

The top 6 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.