Back

Understanding highland adaptation of Apis cerana through repeated while independent colonization

Ke, F.

2026-02-06 evolutionary biology
10.64898/2026.02.05.704106 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Understanding the genetic basis of polygenic adaptation is challenging. Populations that undergo parallel evolution serve as experimental replications enabling the study of molecular mechanism. Apis cerana is widely-distributed in Asia and has repeatedly colonized the Qinghai-Tibet Plateau. The highland populations are derived from lowland colonies while showed not admixture with each other, representing independent events of colonization. We investigated resequencing genomes of five populations to study the genetic basis of highland adaptation in A. cerana. Using two complementary methods, we isolated genes with adaptive signals in each lineage. Although large proportion of adaptive loci are unique to each population, most potentially adaptive polymorphism shared with genetic variation in lowland populations, consistent with widespread signals of soft selection sweeps. Whereas parallelism was low at the level of adaptive loci, it was greater for functional pathways and greatest for phenotypes. Further enrichment analysis found the shared adaptive loci were overrepresented in pathways related to the development of sensory system and body morphogenesis. These highly connected pathways and loci could buffer different genetic paths and maintain developmental stability. Adaptive signals in the development-related loci suggest stabilizing selection further drive phenotypic convergence under similar stress. However, lineage-specific loci and pathways facilitated adaptive divergence in each lineage within the broadly similar highland environment. Our results demonstrate the genetic redundancy of highland adaptation and lineage-specific evolution via independent colonization in A. cerana. This underscores that predicting a populations adaptive potential requires understanding its full adaptive architecture within the ecological context--including abiotic and biotic interactions.

Matching journals

The top 3 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Molecular Ecology
304 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
38.1%
2
Molecular Biology and Evolution
488 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
10.2%
3
BMC Ecology and Evolution
49 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
8.5%
50% of probability mass above
4
eLife
5422 papers in training set
Top 10%
7.2%
5
PLOS Genetics
756 papers in training set
Top 2%
6.4%
6
Nature Communications
4913 papers in training set
Top 42%
3.1%
7
New Phytologist
309 papers in training set
Top 2%
2.8%
8
Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences
341 papers in training set
Top 4%
1.8%
9
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
2130 papers in training set
Top 32%
1.7%
10
Frontiers in Ecology and Evolution
60 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.5%
11
Genome Biology and Evolution
280 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.3%
12
Nature Ecology & Evolution
113 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.2%
13
Evolution Letters
71 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.0%
14
Communications Biology
886 papers in training set
Top 21%
0.8%
15
PLOS Biology
408 papers in training set
Top 18%
0.8%
16
Science Advances
1098 papers in training set
Top 28%
0.8%
17
Journal of Genetics and Genomics
36 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.8%
18
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 74%
0.8%
19
Evolution
199 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.7%
20
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 73%
0.5%
21
Current Biology
596 papers in training set
Top 16%
0.5%
22
BMC Biology
248 papers in training set
Top 7%
0.5%
23
Evolution & Development
18 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
0.5%
24
The Plant Journal
197 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.5%