Back

Early-Enrichment Hit Discovery via Reversible-Work c(t) Estimation in Metadynamics (CTMD)

Adury, V. S. S.; Tiwary, P.; Gu, X.; Shekhar, M.

2026-02-08 biophysics
10.64898/2026.02.05.703972 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Virtual screening for small-molecule binders is often limited by false positives from approximate scoring functions and rigid-receptor assumptions. These can be addressed downstream through accurate but expensive free energy calculations. At the same time, recent artificial-intelligence-based co-folding methods have been proposed that claim to achieve accuracy of free energy methods at much lower cost, but these have not yet delivered consistent improvements in early enrichment and can be confounded by memorization. Here we address this gap by introducing c(t)-based metadynamics (CTMD), a physics-based, high-throughput hit-triaging protocol tailored for early enrichment. CTMD uses the nonequilibrium reversible-work estimator c(t) introduced by Tiwary and Parrinello (Journal of Physical Chemistry B, 2015 119 736), computed from a small number of short, independent well-tempered metadynamics trajectories, to rank binding stability without requiring converged binding free energies. Across diverse targets and chemotypes, CTMD provides robust early enrichment while remaining fast, transferable with minimal parameter tuning, and resistant to memorization-driven artifacts--underscoring both an immediately deployable physics-based alternative for screening. For these systems we show how co-folding, particularly Boltz-2, achieves enrichment directly proportional to similairty with training set, and more worrying, even in the presence of signficant modifications to active site. Given its simplicity of implementation, CTMD should thus be an "embarassingly" open-source, early enrichment method available for use by the broad pharma and academic community that sits right between approximate but fast docking or AI based co-folding methods, and more expensive but accurate free energy calculations, expected to lead to saving significant financial and human capital in drug discovery campaigns.

Matching journals

The top 5 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Chemical Science
71 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
14.6%
2
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
2130 papers in training set
Top 4%
12.4%
3
Journal of the American Chemical Society
199 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
8.3%
4
The Journal of Physical Chemistry Letters
58 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
8.1%
5
Nature Communications
4913 papers in training set
Top 26%
6.8%
50% of probability mass above
6
eLife
5422 papers in training set
Top 13%
6.3%
7
Journal of Chemical Information and Modeling
207 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
6.3%
8
Journal of Chemical Theory and Computation
126 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
3.6%
9
Nature Methods
336 papers in training set
Top 3%
2.3%
10
Structure
175 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.7%
11
Biophysical Journal
545 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.7%
12
Nucleic Acids Research
1128 papers in training set
Top 13%
1.3%
13
Cell Systems
167 papers in training set
Top 8%
1.3%
14
Nature Chemistry
34 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
1.2%
15
ACS Central Science
66 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.9%
16
Patterns
70 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.9%
17
Physical Review X
23 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
0.9%
18
Angewandte Chemie International Edition
81 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.9%
19
Science
429 papers in training set
Top 18%
0.9%
20
Nature Computational Science
50 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.8%
21
Advanced Science
249 papers in training set
Top 18%
0.8%
22
PLOS Computational Biology
1633 papers in training set
Top 23%
0.8%
23
Nature Biotechnology
147 papers in training set
Top 7%
0.8%
24
Science Advances
1098 papers in training set
Top 30%
0.7%
25
Communications Chemistry
39 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.6%
26
Nature
575 papers in training set
Top 17%
0.6%
27
Cell Reports
1338 papers in training set
Top 35%
0.6%
28
Communications Physics
12 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
0.6%
29
Communications Biology
886 papers in training set
Top 29%
0.6%