Back

Accurate somatic variant detection from formalin fixed, paraffin embedded tissue (FFPE) derived WES and WGS by DeepOmicsFFPE-PLUS, a sequence context-based transformer

Kim, W. S.; Lee, A.; Kim, I.; Hong, S.-E.; Park, J.; Lim, J.; Noh, E.; Kim, M.; Park, J.; Han, J.; Park, M.; Cho, H.; Shin, J.; Yang, Y.; Paik, S.; Heo, D.-h.

2026-02-07 cancer biology
10.64898/2026.02.05.702695 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded (FFPE) tissues represent a vast archival resource for genomic studies, yet their utility remains constrained by fixation-induced DNA damage and subsequent sequencing artifacts. To comprehensively characterize and address this challenge, we analyzed matched FFPE and fresh-frozen tumor samples from two institutions, spanning different storage durations, DNA qualities, sequencing platforms (WES and WGS), exome capture kits, and somatic variant callers. We found that FFPE-induced artifacts exhibit strong batch- and age-specific patterns, with a predominance of C:G>T:A substitutions, which particularly complicate the accurate identification of low allele frequency true variants. Enzymatic repair methods partially alleviated these artifacts but remained insufficient. To overcome these limitations, we developed DeepOmicsFFPE-PLUS(https://github.com/Theragen-Bio/DeepOmicsFFPE-PLUS), an advanced AI-based tool to accurately distinguish true somatic variants from FFPE-specific artifacts. DeepOmicsFFPE-PLUS demonstrated consistently superior performance across diverse conditions, achieving high sensitivity and specificity--even for low-frequency variants--outperforming existing tools. Application of our model to WGS data further enabled recovery of biologically relevant mutational signatures, including restoration of microsatellite instability (MSI)-associated signatures initially obscured by FFPE artifacts. Our findings underscore the necessity of artifact-aware variant calling in FFPE genomics and establish DeepOmicsFFPE-PLUS as a robust tool for artifact removal, enabling high-fidelity downstream analyses and personalized therapeutic target discovery.

Matching journals

The top 5 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.