Back

Risk Factors and Risk Score (NOAM score) for Peripartum Cardiomyopathy

Shmueli, H.; Razi, T.; Biron Shental, T.; Cohen, Y.; Shotan, A.; Zahger, D.; Arbel, R.; Lanxner Battat, T.; Yaniv-Salem, S.; Elkayam, U.; Yamin, D.

2026-02-06 cardiovascular medicine
10.64898/2026.02.05.26345708 medRxiv
Show abstract

IntroductionPeripartum cardiomyopathy (PPCM) is a life-threatening pregnancy-associated cardiomyopathy characterized by left ventricular systolic dysfunction. Due to its relative rarity, risk factors are not well established, and a validated risk score is lacking. MethodsWe conducted a retrospective cohort study, analyzing 317,892 deliveries between January 2014-December 2024. PPCM cases were identified by individual clinical chart review and echocardiographic validation. Multivariate logistic regression identified independent predictors. A post hoc stratified analysis created five risk categories to estimate PPCM incidence. ResultsWe identified 107 PPCM cases (1:2,970 deliveries). Significant risk factors included cardiovascular disease or arrhythmias, odds ratio (OR) 8.18 (95% confidence interval [CI], 4.34 to 14.2); preeclampsia, OR 7.50 (95% CI, 4.69 to 11.7); Women of African ancestry, OR 4.39 (95% CI, 2.32 to 7.64); first delivery, OR 3.38 (95% CI, 2.25 to 5.08); multifetal pregnancy, OR 2.76 (95% CI, 1.36 to 5.07); and maternal age older than 35 years, OR 2.30 (95% CI, 1.50 to 3.48). In the post hoc stratified analysis, risk groups demonstrated marked heterogeneity, with risk ranging from 1 per 25,000-7,692 deliveries in the lowest risk group to 1 per 163-65 deliveries in the highest risk group. ConclusionWe identified risk factors for PPCM and developed the NOAM Score, a simple and clinically applicable tool that integrates several domains--preeclampsia, cardiovascular disease, hypertension, Women of African ancestry, primiparity, advanced maternal age and multifetal pregnancy. This framework stratifies women across a wide spectrum of risk and may support earlier identification, risk-guided monitoring, and targeted preventative care.

Matching journals

The top 5 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.