Back

Completeness and timeliness of a contact tracing intervention during the COVID-19 pandemic: an outcome evaluation of the California Contact Tracing Support Initiative

Park, S.; Grantz, K. H.; Lee, K. H.; Rosser, E.; Aldos, L.; Dutta, R.; Peeples, L.-M.; Gurley, E. S.; Marx, M.; Lee, E. C.

2026-02-06 public and global health
10.64898/2026.02.05.26345670 medRxiv
Show abstract

ObjectivesTo describe COVID-19 case investigation and contact tracing outcomes from an intervention conducted in two California counties under the California Contact Tracing Support Initiative (CCTSI). MethodsWe analyzed contact tracing program metrics in two counties using de-identified individual-level records from COVID-19 cases and their contacts. Interviews with 47 program staff were conducted and analyzed using thematic analysis. ResultsIn one county, 64% of assigned COVID-19 cases (2,722 of 4,279) were successfully interviewed, with 77% (2,105) of interviews occurring within 48 hours of receiving test results; 63% of assigned contacts (418 of 660) were notified, with 82% (348) of notifications occurring within 48 hours of contact elicitation. In a second county, 52% of cases (1,743 of 3,352) were interviewed, with 48% (1,621) interviewed occurring within 48 hours; 79% of contacts (155 of 196) were notified, with 82% (127) notified within 48 hours. CCTSI staff reported faster receipt of test results in the early months and positive perceptions of wrap-around service referrals. ConclusionsThe performance of the CCTSI contact tracing intervention differed across two California counties. In both counties, there was moderate to high case interview completion and contact notification overall and within 48 hours of case and contact identification, but relatively few contacts were elicited per case. The perceived benefit of several program features was high among staff and stakeholders. The evaluation highlighted generalizable challenges in contact tracing investigations and linking contact and case records in contact tracing databases.

Matching journals

The top 8 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 8%
19.2%
2
BMC Public Health
147 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
7.0%
3
BMC Health Services Research
42 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
5.0%
4
JMIR Public Health and Surveillance
45 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
5.0%
5
Journal of General Internal Medicine
20 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
4.3%
6
Frontiers in Public Health
140 papers in training set
Top 2%
3.7%
7
Disaster Medicine and Public Health Preparedness
16 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
3.7%
8
BMJ Open
554 papers in training set
Top 6%
3.3%
50% of probability mass above
9
Journal of Medical Internet Research
85 papers in training set
Top 2%
2.2%
10
JAMA Network Open
127 papers in training set
Top 2%
2.1%
11
The Lancet Public Health
20 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.9%
12
American Journal of Epidemiology
57 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
1.9%
13
CMAJ Open
12 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
1.7%
14
Annals of Epidemiology
19 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.7%
15
International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health
124 papers in training set
Top 4%
1.7%
16
PLOS Global Public Health
293 papers in training set
Top 4%
1.3%
17
Annals of Internal Medicine
27 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
1.3%
18
BMJ Open Quality
15 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
1.3%
19
Open Forum Infectious Diseases
134 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.3%
20
BMC Medical Research Methodology
43 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
1.1%
21
International Journal of Behavioral Nutrition and Physical Activity
15 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
1.0%
22
Nature Communications
4913 papers in training set
Top 58%
1.0%
23
Journal of Epidemiology and Community Health
32 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
1.0%
24
BMC Infectious Diseases
118 papers in training set
Top 5%
0.8%
25
Journal of Hospital Infection
27 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
0.8%
26
Eurosurveillance
80 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.8%
27
BMC Medicine
163 papers in training set
Top 7%
0.8%
28
Epidemiology and Infection
84 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.7%
29
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 75%
0.7%
30
Public Health in Practice
11 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
0.7%