Back

Precision diagnosis for monogenic diabetes requires ethnicity specific criteria for genetic testing

Jones, S.; Knupp, J.; Pandya, S.; Groom, O.; Goodall, C.; Sebastian, A.; Baynes, K.; Bellary, S.; Brackenridge, A.; Huda, M. S.; Mahto, R.; Rangasami, J.; Ramtoola, S.; Hattersley, A.; Johnston, D. G.; Colclough, K.; Shields, B.; Houghton, J. A. L.; Misra, S.

2026-02-06 endocrinology
10.64898/2026.02.05.26345659 medRxiv
Show abstract

The detection of monogenic diabetes illustrates the potential of precision medicine, with treatments tailored to specific genes and diagnosis involving targeted genetic testing. Current detection criteria are derived from White populations. We investigated detection of monogenic diabetes in an unselected multiethnic cohort comprising 1,706 participants diagnosed with diabetes before the age of 30-years. Using broad biomarker criteria (triple pancreatic antibody negative and detectable C-peptide) to select for next generation sequencing of monogenic diabetes genes, we found a non-significantly different minimum cohort prevalence of monogenic diabetes of 2.1% in White, 2.0% in South Asian, 2.5% in African-Caribbean, and 3.6% in Mixed participants. The detection rate, however, varied significantly (17.7% in White, 5.3%in South Asian, 8.0% in African-Caribbean, and 15.2% in Mixed participants, p<0.001). Those without monogenic diabetes showed significant variations in BMI. No difference in phenotype of monogenic diabetes across ancestry groups was observed. Non-white ethnicity participants were significantly more likely to have undiagnosed monogenic diabetes than White with on average a 10-year duration before receiving a correct diagnosis. By applying ancestry-specific BMI cut-offs (White <30, South Asian <27, African-Caribbean and Mixed <35 kg/m{superscript 2}), the overall detection rate increased from 8.8 to 16%, reducing the number needed to test to identify one case from 11 to 6 and boosting detection rates to 39, 11, 9 and 26% in White, South Asian, African-Caribbean and Mixed-ethnicity participants, respectively. These findings were validated in an external real-world dataset. Applying broad biomarker criteria for initial selection, mitigates clinical biases leading to misclassification of monogenic diabetes in non-White ethnicities. However, further tailoring criteria with ethnic-specific BMI cut-offs doubled detection rates, improving cost-effectiveness by minimising unnecessary testing. Our study highlights the need to develop precision medicine approaches accounting for phenotypic variation across diverse populations, to ensure accurate diagnoses and cost-efficient healthcare provision.

Matching journals

The top 5 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Diabetes
53 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
18.3%
2
Diabetologia
36 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
14.4%
3
Diabetes Care
12 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
6.7%
4
Molecular Systems Biology
142 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
6.2%
5
The Journal of Clinical Endocrinology & Metabolism
35 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
6.2%
50% of probability mass above
6
Cell Reports Medicine
140 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
4.8%
7
Human Molecular Genetics
130 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
3.9%
8
Cell Genomics
162 papers in training set
Top 1%
3.9%
9
Nature Medicine
117 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
3.9%
10
Molecular Metabolism
105 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
3.5%
11
Nature Communications
4913 papers in training set
Top 42%
3.2%
12
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 54%
1.9%
13
eLife
5422 papers in training set
Top 39%
1.9%
14
Frontiers in Endocrinology
53 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.7%
15
EMBO Molecular Medicine
85 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.7%
16
Communications Medicine
85 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
1.7%
17
eBioMedicine
130 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.5%
18
BMC Medicine
163 papers in training set
Top 5%
1.1%
19
Diabetes, Obesity and Metabolism
17 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
0.9%
20
The American Journal of Human Genetics
206 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.9%
21
International Journal of Epidemiology
74 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.7%
22
Genome Medicine
154 papers in training set
Top 8%
0.7%
23
PLOS Medicine
98 papers in training set
Top 5%
0.7%
24
Nature Genetics
240 papers in training set
Top 8%
0.7%
25
Molecular Therapy - Nucleic Acids
24 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
0.7%
26
eClinicalMedicine
55 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.6%
27
Genetics in Medicine Open
10 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
0.6%