Back

Safety and immunogenicity of a vaccine against coxsackieviruses B (PRV-101) - follow-up of the first-in-human phase 1 trial

Laiho, J. E.; Lehtonen, J. P.; Puustinen, L.; Kaariainen, S.; Harkonen, T.; Oikarinen, S.; Leon, F.; Scheinin, M.; Knip, M.; Sanjuan, M.; Hyoty, H.

2026-02-06 infectious diseases
10.64898/2026.02.05.26345529 medRxiv
Show abstract

BackgroundCoxsackie B viruses cause acute infections and have been linked to chronic diseases like cardiomyopathies, type 1 diabetes, and celiac disease. Despite their clinical significance, no vaccines exist for coxsackie B virus types. PRV-101, a new candidate vaccine covering five coxsackie B virus types, showed good immunogenicity and tolerability in a phase 1 trial (PROVENT). MethodsWe conducted an extended follow-up of the PROVENT trial to assess the long-term immune response and safety of PRV-101. A total of 26 participants from the original cohort (n=32) were enrolled for additional testing approximately two years post-immunization (11 high-dose, 10 low-dose, and 5 placebo). Coxsackie B virus -specific antibody responses were measured and compared to earlier time points. ResultsPRV-101 was safe with no late adverse effects or emergence of autoantibodies linked to type 1 diabetes or celiac disease. Neutralizing virus antibodies remained elevated, with a clear dose-dependent response. In the high-dose group, antibodies against all coxsackie B virus types reached presumably protective levels, except for coxsackie B virus 2, where two participants turned seronegative. ELISA tests confirmed elevated antibody levels against coxsackie B virus proteins. DiscussionThese results suggest that PRV-101 induces durable antibody responses lasting at least two years. The findings support the continued development of PRV-101 for preventing both acute coxsackie B virus infections and chronic diseases like type 1 diabetes and celiac disease.

Matching journals

The top 7 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Vaccine
189 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
23.1%
2
New England Journal of Medicine
50 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
6.5%
3
Vaccines
196 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
5.0%
4
Human Vaccines & Immunotherapeutics
25 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
5.0%
5
The Lancet Infectious Diseases
71 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
5.0%
6
Clinical Infectious Diseases
231 papers in training set
Top 1%
3.8%
7
Frontiers in Immunology
586 papers in training set
Top 2%
3.7%
50% of probability mass above
8
BMC Infectious Diseases
118 papers in training set
Top 2%
2.7%
9
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 45%
2.5%
10
Open Forum Infectious Diseases
134 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
2.4%
11
The Journal of Infectious Diseases
182 papers in training set
Top 2%
2.4%
12
Journal of Medical Virology
137 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.9%
13
eBioMedicine
130 papers in training set
Top 1.0%
1.8%
14
Journal of Clinical Virology
62 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
1.5%
15
Frontiers in Medicine
113 papers in training set
Top 4%
1.4%
16
Nature Communications
4913 papers in training set
Top 54%
1.4%
17
JCI Insight
241 papers in training set
Top 5%
1.3%
18
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 66%
1.3%
19
npj Vaccines
62 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
1.0%
20
eClinicalMedicine
55 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.9%
21
International Journal of Infectious Diseases
126 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.9%
22
BMC Medicine
163 papers in training set
Top 6%
0.9%
23
PLOS Medicine
98 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.9%
24
PLOS Neglected Tropical Diseases
378 papers in training set
Top 5%
0.8%
25
Annals of Internal Medicine
27 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
0.8%
26
Frontiers in Pharmacology
100 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.8%
27
Nature Medicine
117 papers in training set
Top 5%
0.8%
28
Immunology
29 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.7%
29
Journal of Translational Medicine
46 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.5%
30
The Lancet
16 papers in training set
Top 1.0%
0.5%