Back

Safety and immunogenicity of a vaccine against coxsackieviruses B (PRV-101) - follow-up of the first-in-human phase 1 trial

Laiho, J. E.; Lehtonen, J. P.; Puustinen, L.; Kaariainen, S.; Harkonen, T.; Oikarinen, S.; Leon, F.; Scheinin, M.; Knip, M.; Sanjuan, M.; Hyoty, H.

2026-02-06 infectious diseases
10.64898/2026.02.05.26345529 medRxiv
Show abstract

BackgroundCoxsackie B viruses cause acute infections and have been linked to chronic diseases like cardiomyopathies, type 1 diabetes, and celiac disease. Despite their clinical significance, no vaccines exist for coxsackie B virus types. PRV-101, a new candidate vaccine covering five coxsackie B virus types, showed good immunogenicity and tolerability in a phase 1 trial (PROVENT). MethodsWe conducted an extended follow-up of the PROVENT trial to assess the long-term immune response and safety of PRV-101. A total of 26 participants from the original cohort (n=32) were enrolled for additional testing approximately two years post-immunization (11 high-dose, 10 low-dose, and 5 placebo). Coxsackie B virus -specific antibody responses were measured and compared to earlier time points. ResultsPRV-101 was safe with no late adverse effects or emergence of autoantibodies linked to type 1 diabetes or celiac disease. Neutralizing virus antibodies remained elevated, with a clear dose-dependent response. In the high-dose group, antibodies against all coxsackie B virus types reached presumably protective levels, except for coxsackie B virus 2, where two participants turned seronegative. ELISA tests confirmed elevated antibody levels against coxsackie B virus proteins. DiscussionThese results suggest that PRV-101 induces durable antibody responses lasting at least two years. The findings support the continued development of PRV-101 for preventing both acute coxsackie B virus infections and chronic diseases like type 1 diabetes and celiac disease.

Published in Open Forum Infectious Diseases (predicted rank #18) · training set

Matching journals

The top 10 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.