Back

A customizable calculation tool for allocation of adrenal vein sampling in primary aldosteronism in diverse populations

Leung, A. A.; Przybojewski, S. J.; Klamrowski, M.; Caughlin, C. E.; Wright, C.; Pasieka, J. L.; Wu, V.-C.; Lin, Y.-H.; Tsai, R.; Chang, C.-C.; Hundemer, G. L.; King, J.; Austin, K.; Mellor, K.; Hu, L.; Low, J.; Burkart, J.; Kline, G. A.

2026-02-06 endocrinology
10.64898/2026.02.05.26345289
Show abstract

BackgroundPrimary aldosteronism(PA) screening is recommended but disease prevalence exceeds the availability of adrenal vein sampling(AVS). MethodsAn AVS optimal allocation tool for health systems was developed using administrative data and AVS registries from Calgary and Taiwan. Four easily-definable phenotypes of PA based on an elevated aldosterone-renin-ratio (ARR), and the presence/absence of hypokalemia or adrenal mass were identified, representing progressively severe PA and stepwise increasing rates of AVS-defined lateralization. Using supply-and-demand principles, a customizable, web-based tool was developed that considers PA referral volume, PA phenotype prevalence, maximum AVS available/year, AVS success rate, and desired rate of finding unilateral disease. ResultsThe most prevalent phenotype of PA was characterized by an elevated ARR and hypokalemia but no adrenal mass (41.9 [39.9-43.9]%); hypokalemia and adrenal mass accounted for (15.6[14.4-16.9]%) of cases. There was a progressive increase in AVS lateralization rate with increasing severity of phenotype observed in both the Calgary and Taiwan data, ranging from (20-39%) in those with PA without hypokalemia or adrenal mass to (70-90%) in those with hypokalemia and adrenal mass. After accounting for institution-specific lateralization rates and allowing for system-level differences in high- and low-volume PA referrals, and high- and low AVS availability, the customizable AVS allocation tool was able to generate individualized strategies ranging from restrictive (exclusive reservation of AVS for cases with hypokalemia and adrenal mass) to more inclusive strategies (assigning a proportion of AVS allocation to less severe PA cases). ConclusionsAn AVS allocation tool that uses common, simple, and globally available PA case data may assist in health system AVS program case allocation for maximum equity and wait-list control. GRAPHICAL ABSTRACT O_FIG O_LINKSMALLFIG WIDTH=200 HEIGHT=143 SRC="FIGDIR/small/26345289v1_ufig1.gif" ALT="Figure 1"> View larger version (34K): org.highwire.dtl.DTLVardef@1c9be00org.highwire.dtl.DTLVardef@1d91e00org.highwire.dtl.DTLVardef@140aa8aorg.highwire.dtl.DTLVardef@7c76c6_HPS_FORMAT_FIGEXP M_FIG C_FIG

Matching journals

The top 10 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
The Journal of Clinical Endocrinology & Metabolism
based on 26 papers
Top 0.4%
13.5%
2
eLife
based on 262 papers
Top 2%
6.8%
3
PLOS ONE
based on 1737 papers
Top 61%
6.8%
4
BMJ Open
based on 553 papers
Top 18%
6.2%
5
Scientific Reports
based on 701 papers
Top 39%
4.8%
6
BMC Medicine
based on 155 papers
Top 4%
3.1%
7
Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association
based on 53 papers
Top 3%
3.1%
8
JAMIA Open
based on 35 papers
Top 3%
2.7%
9
npj Digital Medicine
based on 85 papers
Top 7%
2.6%
10
Frontiers in Public Health
based on 135 papers
Top 13%
2.5%
50% of probability mass above
11
Frontiers in Endocrinology
based on 20 papers
Top 2%
2.5%
12
Journal of Clinical Medicine
based on 77 papers
Top 6%
2.5%
13
JMIR Public Health and Surveillance
based on 45 papers
Top 3%
2.4%
14
Pharmacoepidemiology and Drug Safety
based on 12 papers
Top 0.5%
1.9%
15
Cureus
based on 64 papers
Top 10%
1.7%
16
JAMA Network Open
based on 125 papers
Top 10%
1.7%
17
Nature Communications
based on 483 papers
Top 33%
1.4%
18
BMC Health Services Research
based on 43 papers
Top 3%
1.4%
19
PLOS Global Public Health
based on 287 papers
Top 16%
1.4%
20
Frontiers in Physiology
based on 18 papers
Top 2%
1.4%
21
JMIRx Med
based on 29 papers
Top 4%
1.3%
22
International Journal of Medical Informatics
based on 25 papers
Top 4%
1.3%
23
BMC Medical Research Methodology
based on 41 papers
Top 4%
1.3%
24
Journal of Clinical and Translational Science
based on 11 papers
Top 1%
1.3%
25
BMJ Nutrition, Prevention & Health
based on 10 papers
Top 1%
0.9%
26
British Journal of Haematology
based on 12 papers
Top 0.7%
0.9%
27
JMIR Research Protocols
based on 18 papers
Top 3%
0.8%
28
Communications Medicine
based on 63 papers
Top 2%
0.8%
29
Journal of Medical Genetics
based on 22 papers
Top 2%
0.8%
30
European Respiratory Journal
based on 44 papers
Top 5%
0.8%