Back

Experiences of a Community Engaged Placement Model; Student, educator, and community stakeholder perspectives.

Rushe, E.; McCurdy, A.; O'Donoghue, M.; Boland, P.; Dillon, S.; O'Leary, D.; Goode, A.; McGarry, T.; Griffin, A.; Simiyu, B.; Purcell, C.

2026-02-09 public and global health
10.64898/2026.02.05.25340232 medRxiv
Show abstract

BackgroundThe University of Limericks Allied Health Community Engaged Placement (CEP) model promotes interprofessional teamwork, enabling allied health students to learn with, from, and about each other through shared community placements. CEPs complement traditional clinical placements by offering socially responsive experiences, fostering community partnerships, and preparing students for diverse practice settings. MethodologyThis mixed method study used a qualitative dominant design, underpinned by social constructivism. Data was collected via focus groups and an online survey. Five focus groups were conducted with students (n=9), practice educators (n=6), and community partners (n=5). Reflexive thematic analysis underpinned qualitative analysis. The survey included an 8-item, 6-point Likert scale to assess perceived skill development, distributed to all three groups. FindingsSix themes were generated: (i) lifting the veil of the social determinants of health, (ii) not your traditional placement, (iii) developing skills to serve communities, (iv) rolling with resistance, sense of growth, and (vi) beyond placement beyond academia. Students valued interprofessional and collaborative skills developed, though some noted clinical skills gaps. Educators observed improved communication and teamwork, while community partners highlighted students leadership, professionalism, and meaningful contributions to the community. DiscussionCommunity engaged placements support development of teamwork, adaptability, and cultural responsiveness skills essential for addressing health inequities. These competencies are achieved through transformative experiences with community members, which cultivate shared learning and growth for students, practice educators, and partners. To maximise impact for all three groups guidelines are needed to support understanding, preparation, and sustainability of placements.

Matching journals

The top 5 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 4%
26.6%
2
BMJ Open
554 papers in training set
Top 2%
10.7%
3
Health Expectations
12 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
5.0%
4
International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health
124 papers in training set
Top 1%
4.4%
5
Frontiers in Public Health
140 papers in training set
Top 1%
4.4%
50% of probability mass above
6
BMC Health Services Research
42 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
4.1%
7
Journal of General Internal Medicine
20 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
3.7%
8
Palliative Medicine
10 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
2.2%
9
BMC Public Health
147 papers in training set
Top 2%
2.1%
10
Journal of Medical Internet Research
85 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.7%
11
British Journal of General Practice
22 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
1.5%
12
BJGP Open
12 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
1.5%
13
PLOS Global Public Health
293 papers in training set
Top 4%
1.4%
14
BMJ Open Quality
15 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
1.4%
15
CMAJ Open
12 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
1.3%
16
Journal of Clinical and Translational Science
11 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
1.3%
17
Trials
25 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.3%
18
JMIR Formative Research
32 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.3%
19
Archives of Public Health
12 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
1.3%
20
DIGITAL HEALTH
12 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
0.9%
21
JMIR Research Protocols
18 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.8%
22
Pilot and Feasibility Studies
12 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
0.8%
23
JMIR Public Health and Surveillance
45 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.7%
24
International Journal of Behavioral Nutrition and Physical Activity
15 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
0.7%
25
F1000Research
79 papers in training set
Top 5%
0.7%
26
Public Health
34 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.7%
27
JMIRx Med
31 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.5%
28
Epidemiology and Infection
84 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.5%
29
Preventive Medicine Reports
14 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
0.5%
30
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 80%
0.5%