Back

Dorsal skin biopsies: A non-lethal sampling method for studying amphibians, including the highly endangered Harlequin frogs (Bufonidae: Atelopus)

Navarrete Mendez, M. J.; Riera, A. B. Q.; Teran-Valdez, A.; Naydenova, E.; Coloma, L. A.; Tarvin, R. D.

2026-02-06 zoology
10.64898/2026.02.04.703782 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Non-lethal sampling methods are increasingly essential for amphibian research as global declines intensify and many species persist in small, vulnerable populations. Skin biopsies offer a promising alternative to whole-animal collection and other minimally invasive approaches; however, systematic evaluations of recovery and impacts on body condition remain limited. Here, we assess the effects of small (2-mm) dorsal skin biopsies in four frog species, including three highly endangered Harlequin frogs (Atelopus bomolochos, A. balios, A. longirostris) and the Gualataco marsupial frog (Gastrotheca riobambae). Under controlled laboratory conditions and in semi-natural enclosures, we monitored wound healing, survival, and body mass trajectories in biopsied and control individuals over a one-month period. Across all species, biopsy sites fully healed within approximately three weeks, following consistent stages of re-epithelialization and subsequent repigmentation. No biopsy-related mortality was observed, and body mass did not differ between biopsied and control individuals, indicating no detectable effects of skin biopsies on body condition during the wound-healing period. Occasional minor post-biopsy reactions resolved without intervention within the observation period. We additionally report anecdotal field recovery observations for three other species (A. coynei, A. laetissimus, and A. sp. aff. longirostris), indicating survival and visible wound closure following release. Together, these results indicate that small dorsal skin biopsies represent a safe, non-lethal sampling method for amphibians, including highly endangered taxa. By providing sufficient tissue for diverse downstream applications--such as chemical analyses, genomics, transcriptomics, microbiome characterization, and disease detection--this approach expands the range of questions that can be addressed while minimizing harm to threatened species.

Matching journals

The top 3 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 2%
33.9%
2
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 3%
12.8%
3
Molecular Ecology
304 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
7.0%
50% of probability mass above
4
eLife
5422 papers in training set
Top 21%
4.1%
5
Journal of Experimental Biology
249 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
4.1%
6
Science of The Total Environment
179 papers in training set
Top 2%
2.7%
7
Molecular Ecology Resources
161 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
2.1%
8
PeerJ
261 papers in training set
Top 5%
1.9%
9
Malaria Journal
48 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
1.7%
10
Biological Conservation
43 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
1.4%
11
Ecology and Evolution
232 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.3%
12
Animals
20 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
1.3%
13
Frontiers in Marine Science
55 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
1.1%
14
Gigabyte
60 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.0%
15
Peer Community Journal
254 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.9%
16
Current Biology
596 papers in training set
Top 12%
0.9%
17
Nature Communications
4913 papers in training set
Top 60%
0.8%
18
Animal Conservation
11 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
0.8%
19
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
2130 papers in training set
Top 43%
0.8%
20
Methods in Ecology and Evolution
160 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.8%
21
Global Change Biology
69 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.7%
22
Global Ecology and Conservation
25 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.7%
23
BMC Biology
248 papers in training set
Top 6%
0.7%
24
iScience
1063 papers in training set
Top 36%
0.7%
25
American Journal of Primatology
17 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
0.7%
26
Developmental Biology
134 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.7%
27
GigaScience
172 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.5%
28
Environmental DNA
49 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
0.5%
29
Environmental Pollution
35 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.5%
30
Advanced Science
249 papers in training set
Top 23%
0.5%