Back

Modeling behavior to disentangle motion-related effects in functional ultrasound imaging in awake, head-fixed mice

Qin, C.; Nelissen, F.; Waasdorp, R.; Lotfi, A.; Rojas, C.; De Angelis, L.; Heemskerk, M.; Kruizinga, P.; Maresca, D.; Keysers, C.; Heiles, B.; Gazzola, V.

2026-02-06 neuroscience
10.64898/2026.02.04.703701 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Functional ultrasound imaging (fUSI) enables brain-wide mapping of hemodynamic activity in awake rodents, offering a powerful bridge between systems neuroscience in animals and human neuroimaging. However, extending fUSI beyond tightly controlled sensory paradigms to more naturalistic behaviors is limited by motion-related confounds arising from locomotion, physiological arousal, and movement-linked neural activity. Here, we introduce a behavior-informed modeling framework that explicitly incorporates continuous measurements of running speed and head motion into a general linear model to account for motion-related variance while preserving interpretable task-related signals. We validate this approach in two head-fixed paradigms with distinct motion profiles: a visual stimulation task with minimal stimulus-driven movement, and a noxious stimulation task in which locomotion and arousal are intrinsic to the behavioral response. In both cases, explicit behavioral modeling recovers neural response patterns that more closely resemble low-motion reference conditions than blind, model-free denoising approaches. Critically, during noxious stimulation, behavior-informed modeling preserves shock-intensity-dependent activity in the primary somatosensory cortex that is attenuated by global component removal. These findings demonstrate that explicit modeling of behavior enables reliable interpretation of brain-wide fUSI signals during naturalistic, high-motion conditions, opening the door to studying affective and cognitive processes that were previously difficult to access with functional ultrasound imaging.

Matching journals

The top 6 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.