Back

Neural integrator and orchestrator communities shape spontaneous signaling in the human brain

Pini, L.; Dugo, R.; Pigato, P.; Corbetta, M.

2026-02-05 neuroscience
10.64898/2026.02.04.703687 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Understanding how intrinsic brain dynamics are organized is critical for explaining human cognition and sensory processing. Theoretical frameworks propose a hierarchical architecture in which some neural systems act as orchestrators, broadcasting information across the brain, whereas others serve as integrators, transforming incoming signals. Here, we quantitatively test whether this orchestration-integration framework is embedded in intrinsic brain activity, that is, in the absence of explicit cognitive/sensorial tasks. We adopt a multivariate fractional modeling framework originally developed in financial mathematics to characterize how volatility propagates across interacting markets, thereby identifying systems that act as orchestrators or integrators. We then test whether this integrator-orchestrator axis is related to human intelligence. To this end, using 7T resting-state functional magnetic resonance imaging data from 173 healthy young adults, we model spontaneous brain fluctuations with a multivariate fractional Ornstein-Uhlenbeck process to derive directional influence indices. Consistent with our predictions, we identified a bipartite organization, stable across modeling choices. At the subcortical level, the anterior thalamus, putamen, and caudate emerged as orchestrating transmitters, whereas the posterior thalamus, globus pallidus, hippocampus, amygdala, and nucleus accumbens acted as integrating receivers. At the cortical level, attentional and sensory networks functioned as orchestrating transmitters, while higher-order cognitive networks served as integrating receivers. These findings provide support for a theoretically grounded integration-orchestration framework, demonstrating that brain signaling is organized along this axis even at rest, relevant for intelligence scores. The proposed fractional framework offers a principled tool to investigate how disruptions of this balance may contribute to brain disorders. Competing Interest StatementNone.

Matching journals

The top 3 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
2130 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
39.0%
2
Nature Communications
4913 papers in training set
Top 16%
10.4%
3
eLife
5422 papers in training set
Top 16%
5.0%
50% of probability mass above
4
PLOS Computational Biology
1633 papers in training set
Top 8%
4.1%
5
Neuron
282 papers in training set
Top 5%
2.5%
6
Science Advances
1098 papers in training set
Top 11%
2.4%
7
Current Biology
596 papers in training set
Top 7%
2.1%
8
PNAS Nexus
147 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.9%
9
Nature Human Behaviour
85 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.9%
10
Science
429 papers in training set
Top 13%
1.8%
11
eneuro
389 papers in training set
Top 5%
1.8%
12
Nature Neuroscience
216 papers in training set
Top 4%
1.7%
13
Bulletin of Mathematical Biology
84 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.4%
14
Advanced Science
249 papers in training set
Top 14%
1.3%
15
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 65%
1.3%
16
Cell Reports
1338 papers in training set
Top 28%
1.3%
17
Communications Biology
886 papers in training set
Top 15%
1.1%
18
Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences
341 papers in training set
Top 5%
1.1%
19
Nature
575 papers in training set
Top 13%
1.0%
20
Communications Physics
12 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
1.0%
21
Physical Review Letters
43 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
0.9%
22
Network Neuroscience
116 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.8%
23
PRX Life
34 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
0.7%
24
Cerebral Cortex
357 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.7%
25
Neural Computation
36 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
0.7%
26
The Journal of Neuroscience
928 papers in training set
Top 9%
0.5%
27
Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B
51 papers in training set
Top 7%
0.5%
28
Frontiers in Computational Neuroscience
53 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.5%
29
Physical Review Research
46 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.5%