Back

A Population Coupling Model Identifies Reduced Propagation from V1 to Higher Visual Areas During Locomotion

Xin, Q.; Urban, K. N.; Siegle, J. H.; Kass, R. E.

2026-02-06 neuroscience
10.64898/2026.02.04.703681 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Point process generalized linear models (GLMs) have been a major tool for studying coordinated activity across populations of neurons. These models typically quantify how the spiking of a single neuron depends on the past activity of other neurons at multiple time lags, and the resulting neuron-to-neuron interactions are then aggregated to obtain population-coupling effects. However, when neurons within the same population exhibit similar spiking patterns, explicitly modeling individual interactions can be redundant and can unnecessarily increase model complexity. In such cases, population-level formulations may offer a more efficient alternative. For example, biophysical population models often characterize circuit dynamics using the average firing rate across neurons within a population, and recent data-driven approaches have similarly demonstrated the utility of population-level statistics for capturing cross-population interactions. Motivated by this consideration, we reformulate the GLM framework to operate directly at the population level. The resulting model, which we call pop-GLM, provides a computationally efficient method for estimating coupling between populations. In a simulated dataset, we show that pop-GLM achieves greater sensitivity in detecting coupling effects and can account for trial-to-trial variation in stimulus drive, which would otherwise introduce bias. We also note that moving from single-neuron to population-level modeling requires a specific modification of the traditional GLM framework. We then apply pop-GLM to real data and find reduced functional connectivity from primary visual cortex (V1) to a higher visual area during locomotion, a change not detected by single-neuron GLMs. Author summaryA central goal of systems neuroscience is to understand how multiple populations of neurons across different brain areas interact as a coordinated circuit to produce perception and behavior. We formulated and investigated a new method for estimating functional interactions between two populations of spiking neurons, and we show that it can be more sensitive and robust than previous approaches. To illustrate, we discovered decreased interaction between two mouse visual areas during locomotion, a result that previous techniques did not detect. The method should aid investigators in searching for important functional relationships across populations of neurons, with precise time scale resolution.

Matching journals

The top 4 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
PLOS Computational Biology
1633 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
25.6%
2
eneuro
389 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
17.5%
3
Neural Computation
36 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
4.8%
4
Frontiers in Neural Circuits
36 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
4.3%
50% of probability mass above
5
Network Neuroscience
116 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
4.2%
6
Journal of Neuroscience Methods
106 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
4.0%
7
Journal of Neurophysiology
263 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
3.6%
8
Journal of Computational Neuroscience
23 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
3.2%
9
Journal of Neural Engineering
197 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
2.6%
10
Frontiers in Computational Neuroscience
53 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.9%
11
Neural Networks
32 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
1.7%
12
Frontiers in Neuroscience
223 papers in training set
Top 4%
1.7%
13
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
2130 papers in training set
Top 36%
1.3%
14
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 64%
1.3%
15
eLife
5422 papers in training set
Top 49%
1.2%
16
Neuroscience
88 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.9%
17
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 64%
0.9%
18
Frontiers in Cellular Neuroscience
79 papers in training set
Top 1.0%
0.9%
19
NeuroImage
813 papers in training set
Top 5%
0.9%
20
Communications Biology
886 papers in training set
Top 19%
0.9%
21
Bulletin of Mathematical Biology
84 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.9%
22
BMC Bioinformatics
383 papers in training set
Top 7%
0.8%
23
Biological Cybernetics
12 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
0.8%
24
Hippocampus
46 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
0.7%
25
The Journal of Neuroscience
928 papers in training set
Top 8%
0.7%
26
PLOS Genetics
756 papers in training set
Top 16%
0.7%
27
iScience
1063 papers in training set
Top 37%
0.6%
28
Nature Communications
4913 papers in training set
Top 65%
0.6%