Back

Normative Deviations Reveal Task-Evoked and Clinical Network Reorganization

Kroell, J.-P.; Abdelmotaleb, M.; Kocatas, H.; Mueller, V.; Paas, L.; Meinzer, M.; Floeel, A.; Eickhoff, S.; Patil, K.

2026-02-06 neuroscience
10.64898/2026.02.04.703503 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Understanding how cognitive demands and pathology reshape large-scale functional connectivity (FC) requires methods that are both multivariate and region-specific. Here we introduce One-class SVM-based Connectome Anomaly Recognition (OSCAR), a normative modelling framework that detects condition-related deviations in the multivariate connectivity profile of a brain region. OSCAR learns the distribution of region-to-whole-brain connectivity patterns given a reference state sample (e.g. resting-state data; RS) using a one-class support vector machine (OCSVM). The trained models are then applied to FC profiles from a target condition (e.g., task or patient group). The outlier proportions are used to quantify the difference between the reference and target condition. We validated OSCAR on three diverse tasks and a patient cohort with early psychosis. OSCAR consistently identified condition-sensitive regions in networks known to support conflict processing, object-location memory, lexical learning, and early psychosis, respectively, including thalamic and basal ganglia regions. Moreover, it detected additional well-established task- or disease-relevant parcels not captured by the comparison method permutation-based multivariate analysis of variance (perMANOVA). Regions flagged by OSCAR were at least as close, and often closer, to independent task-activation findings than those identified by perMANOVA. These results demonstrate that OSCAR provides an interpretable, region-centred normative modelling approach that is sensitive to subtle multivariate FC deviations, and offers a practical tool for mapping condition-specific reconfigurations of functional brain networks with high external validity, in both experimental and clinical settings.

Matching journals

The top 6 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
NeuroImage
813 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
18.4%
2
Human Brain Mapping
295 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
10.0%
3
Network Neuroscience
116 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
9.0%
4
Communications Biology
886 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
6.3%
5
Nature Communications
4913 papers in training set
Top 29%
6.3%
6
Advanced Science
249 papers in training set
Top 4%
4.8%
50% of probability mass above
7
Medical Image Analysis
33 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
3.6%
8
Nature Neuroscience
216 papers in training set
Top 3%
3.5%
9
Imaging Neuroscience
242 papers in training set
Top 1%
3.2%
10
eLife
5422 papers in training set
Top 31%
2.7%
11
PLOS Computational Biology
1633 papers in training set
Top 12%
2.6%
12
Brain
154 papers in training set
Top 2%
2.6%
13
Science Advances
1098 papers in training set
Top 13%
2.1%
14
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
2130 papers in training set
Top 28%
2.1%
15
Cell Reports
1338 papers in training set
Top 21%
2.1%
16
NeuroImage: Clinical
132 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.8%
17
eneuro
389 papers in training set
Top 6%
1.7%
18
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 59%
1.7%
19
Biological Psychiatry
119 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.3%
20
PLOS Biology
408 papers in training set
Top 14%
1.2%
21
Nature Mental Health
18 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
0.8%
22
Patterns
70 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.7%
23
eBioMedicine
130 papers in training set
Top 5%
0.6%