Back

Scalable probe-based single-cell transcriptional profiling for virtual cell perturbation mapping and synthetic biology phenotyping

Swinderman, J. T.; Tung, P.-Y.; Winters, A.; Goudy, L.; Wilson, C. M.; Bounds, L. R.; Teyssier, N.; Agrawal, A.; Dobin, A.; Hua, T.; Goodarzi, H.; Feng, F. Y.; Marson, A.; Burke, D. P.; Hsu, P. D.; Roohani, Y. H.; Konermann, S.; Kosicki, M.; Li, N.; Gilbert, L. A.

2026-02-05 synthetic biology
10.64898/2026.02.04.703058 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Large-scale single-cell transcriptional phenotyping of genetic perturbations (perturb-seq) links genes to phenotypes and should enable virtual cell predictive modeling and cellular engineering. However, current perturb-seq single-cell methods are costly, information sparse and require barcodes for many applications. We developed ProPer-seq, a perturb-seq method that uses multiplexed custom DNA probe panels to measure and phenotype synthetic biology perturbations at single-cell resolution without barcodes, including multidomain proteins and sgRNAs. ProPer-seq faithfully reproduces gold-standard perturb-seq phenotypes while achieving 4-fold cost reduction and 50% increased gene detection per cell. As a scalable fixed-cell profiling method, ProPer-seq enables atlas-scale profiling for virtual-cell initiatives and demonstrates data quality suitable for training and validating predictive models. Lastly, ProPer-seqs targeted detection of modular transgenes enables library-on-library perturbation profiling of combinatorial synthetic protein design spaces. We applied this to 3,550 sgRNA x dCas9 effector combinations as well as 260 CAR x ORF combinations dynamically profiled in primary T cells, revealing principles of transcriptional control and cell state modulation by multidomain synthetic transgenes.

Matching journals

The top 4 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.