Back

Intrinsic fitness differences outweigh environmental matching in shaping introduction outcomes in nature

Eckert, L.; Bolnick, D. I.; Derry, A. M.; Haines, G. E.; Heckley, A. M.; Lind, A. J.; Peichel, C. L.; Roth, A. M.; Steinel, N. C.; Vlahiotis, K.; Weber, J. N.; Hendry, A. P.; Barrett, R. D.

2026-02-05 evolutionary biology
10.64898/2026.02.04.699496 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Species introductions and transplants offer powerful contexts to understand evolutionary patterns and processes, and they are increasingly critical for conservation. However, introduction success varies widely, and predicting outcomes remains challenging. Introducing multiple source populations should increase the chance of success, while also providing an opportunity to explore the factors that predict success of individual source populations in the same environment. We used replicated, mixed-population introductions of >12,000 threespine stickleback (Gasterosteus aculeatus) to test whether source population success could be predicted by environmental matching between source and recipient environments and/or by intrinsic source population characteristics. We introduced four to eight source populations of stickleback into each of nine natural lakes and tracked their relative success over the following two years (up to two generations). Source population success was largely consistent across lakes, despite divergent environmental conditions. These results point to the importance of intrinsic source population characteristics rather than environmental matching in predicting introduction success in natural settings. Source populations that were consistently successful tended to have greater stress tolerance (mortality rate during translocation) and higher genetic diversity, though these relationships were not conclusive. Our study highlights the value of considering factors that generate fitness differences independent of environmental contexts in predicting ecological and evolutionary dynamics and planning conservation programs. Significance StatementPredicting which populations will succeed when introduced to new environments is a central challenge in ecology, evolution, and conservation. Environmental conditions are often assumed to be crucial in determining which populations succeed, given the expectation that populations preadapted to local conditions should perform best. We test this assumption by introducing >12,000 threespine stickleback fish from up to eight source populations into nine natural lakes spanning diverse environmental conditions. We show that the relative success of individual source populations was remarkably consistent across lakes and environmental conditions, indicating that some populations are intrinsically better suited to introductions. Our findings underscore the importance of considering intrinsic population characteristics alongside environmental conditions when predicting ecological and evolutionary outcomes and guiding conservation efforts.

Matching journals

The top 5 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
The American Naturalist
114 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
13.9%
2
Ecology Letters
121 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
13.9%
3
Evolution Letters
71 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
11.9%
4
Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B
51 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
9.8%
5
Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences
341 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
9.8%
50% of probability mass above
6
Evolution
199 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
8.1%
7
Molecular Ecology
304 papers in training set
Top 1%
6.2%
8
eLife
5422 papers in training set
Top 28%
3.5%
9
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
2130 papers in training set
Top 25%
2.6%
10
Nature Ecology & Evolution
113 papers in training set
Top 2%
2.3%
11
Nature Communications
4913 papers in training set
Top 52%
1.6%
12
Evolutionary Applications
91 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
1.6%
13
Current Biology
596 papers in training set
Top 10%
1.4%
14
Global Change Biology
69 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.9%
15
Journal of Evolutionary Biology
98 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
0.8%
16
Science Advances
1098 papers in training set
Top 29%
0.8%
17
Science
429 papers in training set
Top 20%
0.7%
18
PLOS Biology
408 papers in training set
Top 22%
0.7%
19
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 70%
0.7%
20
Methods in Ecology and Evolution
160 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.7%
21
Journal of Animal Ecology
63 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.6%
22
Journal of Heredity
35 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
0.6%