Back

Association Between Platelet Indices and Platelet Count in Patients with Immune Thrombocytopenia During Routine Follow-up

Alalagy, S. J.; Altaeb, S.

2026-02-05 hematology
10.64898/2026.02.04.26345597 medRxiv
Show abstract

AimsTo evaluate the association between platelet indices and platelet count severity in patients with primary immune thrombocytopenia during routine post-treatment follow-up. MethodsThis retrospective observational study included patients with primary immune thrombocytopenia followed at a single tertiary care center between 2011 and 2025. Demographic and laboratory data were obtained from medical records. Platelet count severity was categorized as less than 30 x 10^9/L, 30 to 100 x 10^9/L, and greater than 100 x 10^9/L. Platelet indices, including mean platelet volume (MPV) and platelet distribution width (PDW), were analyzed using the most recent complete blood count obtained during routine follow-up after treatment initiation. Continuous variables were summarized as median and interquartile range. Comparisons across platelet count categories were performed using the Kruskal-Wallis test with post hoc Mann-Whitney U testing. Correlation analysis and simple linear regression were also conducted. ResultsA total of 243 patients were identified, of whom 232 met the inclusion criteria. Platelet distribution width differed significantly across platelet count severity categories (Kruskal-Wallis p < 0.001) and demonstrated a strong inverse association with platelet count. Mean platelet volume also showed a statistically significant difference across platelet count groups (Kruskal-Wallis p = 0.007), although the association was weaker and less consistent compared with PDW. Regression analysis confirmed a significant association between platelet count and PDW. ConclusionPlatelet distribution width is more closely associated with platelet count severity than mean platelet volume in patients with primary immune thrombocytopenia during routine post-treatment follow-up. PDW may represent a useful adjunctive laboratory parameter when interpreted alongside platelet count in routine clinical practice.

Matching journals

The top 4 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
British Journal of Haematology
15 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
29.4%
2
Clinical Chemistry and Laboratory Medicine (CCLM)
12 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
8.9%
3
Frontiers in Medicine
113 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
6.8%
4
Blood Advances
54 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
5.2%
50% of probability mass above
5
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 30%
5.2%
6
Frontiers in Immunology
586 papers in training set
Top 2%
3.5%
7
Transactions of The Royal Society of Tropical Medicine and Hygiene
16 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
3.5%
8
Blood
67 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
2.8%
9
Vaccines
196 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
2.2%
10
Journal of Leukocyte Biology
40 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
2.2%
11
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 56%
1.8%
12
Diagnostic Microbiology and Infectious Disease
21 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
1.4%
13
Journal of Thrombosis and Haemostasis
28 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
1.4%
14
Circulation Research
39 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
1.3%
15
Journal of Molecular Cell Biology
21 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
1.3%
16
RMD Open
13 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.3%
17
Clinical and Translational Science
21 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
1.3%
18
Infectious Diseases and Therapy
18 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
1.3%
19
BMC Public Health
147 papers in training set
Top 5%
0.8%
20
International Journal of Infectious Diseases
126 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.8%
21
Physiological Reports
35 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.8%
22
Cytometry Part A
30 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
0.7%
23
Transplantation
13 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
0.7%
24
BMJ Nutrition, Prevention & Health
10 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
0.5%
25
Biomedicines
66 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.5%
26
PLOS Computational Biology
1633 papers in training set
Top 28%
0.5%
27
Public Health in Practice
11 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
0.5%
28
Archives of Clinical and Biomedical Research
28 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.5%