Back

Disentangling Environmental and Genetic Influences on the Association Between Childhood Bullying Victimization and Psychotic-Like Experiences

Karcher, N. R.; Barch, D. M.; Oh, H.; Paul, S.; Osborne, K. J.; Baranger, D. A.; Bogdan, R.; Agrawal, A.; Johnson, E. C.

2026-02-05 psychiatry and clinical psychology
10.64898/2026.02.04.26345591 medRxiv
Show abstract

Psychotic-like experiences (PLEs) are common in youth and predict later mental health problems. Bullying victimization is a robust environmental risk factor for psychopathology including PLEs, but whether its association with PLEs reflects shared genetic liability, individual-specific putatively causal effects, or reciprocal processes is unclear. We analyzed seven waves of longitudinal data from the Adolescent Brain Cognitive Development (ABCD) Study, examining associations across the sample in addition to leveraging within-family comparisons among twin and sibling pairs who were concordant or discordant for exposure to bullying victimization. Using linear mixed-effects and cross-lagged models, we found that youth reporting bullying victimization were more likely to endorse significantly distressing PLEs than non-victimized youth (caregiver-reported odds ratio=2.35; youth-reported odds ratio=4.10). Longitudinal analyses revealed bidirectional associations: prior bullying predicted subsequent increases in distressing PLEs, and prior PLEs predicted elevated risk of later bullying victimization. Genetically-informed within-family analyses indicated that both shared genetic influences and individual-specific factors contributed to these associations; critically, bullied youth exhibited higher odds of distressing PLEs than their non-exposed siblings (youth-reported odds ratio=6.67; 95%CI:4.96-8.96), consistent with an individual-specific effect of victimization. Together, these findings suggest that bullying and PLEs are linked through reciprocal developmental processes that are not fully explained by familial confounding. More broadly, our results highlight bullying prevention as a plausible leverage point for reducing early psychosis-spectrum risk and illustrate the value of integrating within-family designs to help disentangle genetic and environmental contributions to mental health outcomes in adolescence. Significance StatementUnderstanding how early adversity shapes mental health trajectories is important for science and public policy. Using nationally representative, longitudinal twin and sibling data, analyses show that bullying victimization and psychotic-like experiences in youth are linked through reciprocal processes that cannot be fully explained by shared genetics or family background. Bullied youth were more likely to endorse distressing psychotic-like experiences than their own non-bullied siblings, providing rare evidence for individual-specific effects of bullying victimization. Early psychotic-like experiences also increased subsequent risk of being bullied, suggesting a potential feedback loop that may compound risk. These findings demonstrate how social environments and mental health dynamically interact and point to bullying prevention as a population-level strategy with potential to reduce early psychopathology risk.

Matching journals

The top 8 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Nature Communications
4913 papers in training set
Top 20%
9.8%
2
Biological Psychiatry
119 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
8.1%
3
Molecular Psychiatry
242 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
6.6%
4
Nature Neuroscience
216 papers in training set
Top 1%
6.6%
5
Neuropsychopharmacology
134 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
6.2%
6
Biological Psychiatry Global Open Science
54 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
6.1%
7
Nature Genetics
240 papers in training set
Top 2%
4.7%
8
Psychological Medicine
74 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
3.8%
50% of probability mass above
9
eLife
5422 papers in training set
Top 23%
3.8%
10
Nature Mental Health
18 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
3.6%
11
JAMA Psychiatry
13 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
3.5%
12
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
2130 papers in training set
Top 22%
3.5%
13
Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry
25 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
3.0%
14
Science
429 papers in training set
Top 10%
2.8%
15
Nature
575 papers in training set
Top 9%
2.5%
16
Nature Medicine
117 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.6%
17
PLOS Medicine
98 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.6%
18
Schizophrenia Bulletin
29 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
1.6%
19
Biological Psychiatry: Cognitive Neuroscience and Neuroimaging
62 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.4%
20
American Journal of Psychiatry
20 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.4%
21
Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews
43 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
1.3%
22
Nature Human Behaviour
85 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.3%
23
Neuron
282 papers in training set
Top 7%
1.2%
24
The British Journal of Psychiatry
21 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
1.1%
25
Science Advances
1098 papers in training set
Top 26%
0.9%
26
The Journal of Neuroscience
928 papers in training set
Top 8%
0.8%
27
BMC Medicine
163 papers in training set
Top 7%
0.8%
28
Brain, Behavior, and Immunity
105 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.6%
29
Neurobiology of Stress
42 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
0.6%