Racial and Ethnic Differences in the Determinants of Antibiotic Use for Acute Gastroenteritis in the United States
Kim, D.; Ismail, R.; Roberts, F.; Tarr, G. A. M.
Show abstract
BackgroundMost gastrointestinal infections do not require antimicrobial treatment, and the overall rate of use is low. However, differences in use across major American racial and ethnic groups is poorly understood. We estimated racial and ethnic disparities in antibiotic use for gastroenteritis and identified population-specific factors associated with use. MethodsWe analyzed the nationally representative 2018-2019 FoodNet Population Survey, limited to 1,950 individuals reporting gastroenteritis in the previous 7 days. Race and ethnicity were categorized as non-Hispanic Black, Hispanic, Other (Asian, Pacific Islander, American Indian and Alaska Native, and multiracial), and non-Hispanic White. Modified Poisson regression with survey weights estimated risk ratios for antibiotic use overall and within racial and ethnic groups. ResultsAntibiotic use was substantially higher among non-Hispanic Black (RR 4.6; 95% CI 4.01, 5.28), Hispanic (RR 2.2; 95% CI 1.00, 4.96), and Other (RR 3.8; 95%CI 2.27, 6.38) individuals, relative to non-Hispanic White respondents. Clinical factors were strongly associated with use in all racial and ethnic groups. However, socioeconomic associations qualitatively differed across groups; for example, higher income was associated with greater antibiotic use among Hispanic individuals but lower use among non-Hispanic Black individuals. Associations with social environment factors, such as Social Vulnerability Index and provider density, also varied by group. ConclusionsWe identified marked racial and ethnic disparities in antibiotic use, even after accounting for clinical and socioeconomic factors. Drivers of use differed by group, underscoring the need for tailored stewardship strategies and attention to the sociocultural factors influencing access to care and treatment decisions. SummaryAntibiotic use for gastroenteritis is low; however, antibiotic use is significantly greater among individuals identifying as Black, Hispanic, or other races and ethnicities, relative to White individuals. Factors associated with use vary by population, emphasizing needed tailoring of stewardship strategies.
Matching journals
The top 7 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Younger and Rural Children are More Likely to be Hospitalized for SARS-CoV-2 Infections 93%
- Clinical Characteristics and Outcomes for 7,995 Patients with SARS-CoV-2 Infection 92%
- The COVID-19 health equity twindemic: Statewide epidemiologic trends of SARS-CoV-2 outcomes among racial minorities and in rural America 92%
Similar papers in this journal
- Clinical Impact of Multiplex Molecular Diagnostic Testing in Children with Acute Gastroenteritis Presenting to An Emergency Department: A Multicenter Prospective Study 94%
- Characteristics and Factors Associated with COVID-19 Infection, Hospitalization, and Mortality Across Race and Ethnicity 93%
- Reduction in antibiotic prescribing attainable with a gonococcal vaccine 92%
Similar papers in this journal
Similar papers in this journal
- The roles of stewardship and socioeconomic status in geographic variation in antibiotic prescribing: an observational study 93%
- Pediatric antibiotic use associated with respiratory syncytial virus and influenza in the United States, 2008-2018 92%
- Recombinant adjuvanted zoster vaccine and reduced risk of COVID-19 diagnosis and hospitalization in older adults 91%
Similar papers in this journal
- Behavior-change interventions to improve antimicrobial stewardship in human health, animal health, and livestock agriculture: A systematic review 92%
- Derivation and external validation of a clinical prognostic model identifying children at risk of death following presentation for diarrheal care 92%
- The development and validation of a survey to measure fecal-oral child exposure to zoonotic enteropathogens: The FECEZ Enteropathogens Index 91%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.