Back

ICU-level variation in arterial blood gas utilization and patient in-hospital mortality in critically ill patients: A retrospective cohort study using the Japanese Intensive care PAtient Database registry

Yawata, S.; Uchino, S.; Yamashima, S.; Nishiyama, S.; Ono, S.; Sasabuchi, Y.; Katayama, S.

2026-02-05 intensive care and critical care medicine
10.64898/2026.02.04.26345574 medRxiv
Show abstract

BackgroundThe role of arterial blood gas (ABG) testing in the intensive care unit (ICU) remains debated within the "less is more" paradigm. While unnecessary testing may pose risks without benefit, timely ABGs provide critical information in unstable patients. Institutional variation in early ABG utilization and its association with outcomes remains unclear. MethodsWe conducted a multicenter retrospective cohort study using the Japanese Intensive Care PAtient Database (JIPAD) between April 2015 and March 2023. Adult ICU patients with a stay [≥]24 h and arterial line placement were included. The standardized number of ABGs (SNABGs) within the first 24 h was calculated as the ratio of observed to expected values, where expectations were derived from a multivariable model adjusting for patient covariates. ICUs were categorized into tertiles according to SNABG utilization. The primary outcome was in-hospital mortality, analyzed using multilevel logistic regression with ICU-level random intercepts. Restricted cubic splines were used to explore non-linear associations. ResultsAmong 117,546 patients from 87 ICUs, the mean number of ABGs varied widely. After standardization, SNABGs ranged from 0.73-0.90 in the low tertile to 1.09-1.15 in the high tertile. In the multilevel model, SNABG was not significantly associated with in-hospital mortality (adjusted OR 0.942 [95% CI 0.807-1.100] for tertile 2; 0.874 [95% CI 0.751-1.017] for tertile 3). Flexible modeling suggested a non-linear trend toward better outcomes with higher utilization, but confidence intervals included unity. ConclusionEarly ABG utilization varied across ICUs, yet was not significantly associated with mortality. Sensitivity analysis suggested a non-linear relationship, with a tendency toward better outcomes at higher utilization. These findings warrant further investigation to clarify the role of early ABG utilization in critical care.

Matching journals

The top 4 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 9%
18.7%
2
Critical Care Explorations
15 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
18.7%
3
Critical Care
14 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
8.4%
4
BMJ Open
554 papers in training set
Top 5%
4.3%
50% of probability mass above
5
Frontiers in Medicine
113 papers in training set
Top 1%
4.2%
6
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 36%
3.6%
7
Journal of Clinical Medicine
91 papers in training set
Top 2%
3.3%
8
British Journal of Anaesthesia
14 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
2.6%
9
JAMA Network Open
127 papers in training set
Top 1%
2.4%
10
The Journal of Infectious Diseases
182 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.9%
11
Journal of General Internal Medicine
20 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
1.7%
12
Pediatric Research
18 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.7%
13
Journal of Stroke and Cerebrovascular Diseases
12 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
1.7%
14
EClinicalMedicine
21 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
1.5%
15
F1000Research
79 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.3%
16
Journal of Internal Medicine
12 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
1.3%
17
European Respiratory Journal
54 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.3%
18
eBioMedicine
130 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.3%
19
American Journal of Physiology-Regulatory, Integrative and Comparative Physiology
13 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.2%
20
Bioinformatics
1061 papers in training set
Top 8%
1.0%
21
Neurocritical Care
11 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
0.9%
22
BMC Medicine
163 papers in training set
Top 6%
0.8%
23
BMJ
49 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.7%
24
Physiological Genomics
15 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
0.7%
25
American Journal of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine
39 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
0.7%
26
Journal of Infection
71 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.7%
27
Physiological Measurement
12 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
0.7%
28
BMC Medical Informatics and Decision Making
39 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.6%
29
JAMIA Open
37 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.6%