Back

Ecological drivers of chikungunya virus transmission: baseline results from a geographically structured, longitudinal study in southern Thailand

Rapheal, E.; Buddhari, D.; Meyer, A.; Hunsawong, T.; Mendoza Guerrero, S.; Fernandez, S.; Farmer, A.; Anderson, K.; Dean, N.; Perkins, T. A.; Chusri, S.; Stoddard, S. T.

2026-02-06 epidemiology
10.64898/2026.02.04.26345533 medRxiv
Show abstract

BackgroundChikungunya virus (CHIKV) infection can cause significant and long-term morbidity. CHIKV typically appears in explosive outbreaks then vanishes for decades, but evidence from longitudinal studies suggests that it may persist in some populations through low levels of subclinical infection. These epidemiologic dynamics complicate prediction of CHIKV outbreaks and intervention trial planning. Songkhla province in southern Thailand is a promising location for vaccine trials due to its recent history of CHIKV outbreaks (2008 and 2018) and emerging data suggesting low levels of interepidemic transmission. Methodology and Principal FindingsHere, we describe baseline findings from a longitudinal cohort study (2022-2024, n = 5000) of CHIKV transmission in Songkhla. We used serocatalytic models to estimate CHIKV force of infection (FOI), adjusting for risk factors including developed land use surrounding the household, access to garbage collection and clean water, and others. Baseline CHIKV seropositivity in the cohort was 34.6%. Our crude catalytic model estimated 0.0160 (95% CI: 0.0153-0.0168) annual FOI. In adjusted FOI models, a higher proportion of developed land use was associated with an increase in risk of CHIK seropositivity among participants under age 12 (OR: 1.36; 1.25-1.48), who would have been exposed only to the 2018 outbreak, but associated with a decrease in risk (OR: 0.96; 0.94-0.99) among those ages 12 and up, who would have been exposed to two or more outbreaks. ConclusionsThese findings suggest that CHIKV infection risk is highly spatially variable, with prediction complicated by historical differences in virus strain and vector. Distinct ecological patterns of exposure are consistent with the 2018-20 outbreak affecting largely urban areas, with little to no exposures in rural areas, while the 2008-09 outbreak was concentrated more heavily in rural areas. Understanding the ecological drivers of this variation has important implications for identifying regions of highest risk for a future CHIKV outbreak.

Matching journals

The top 10 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Emerging Infectious Diseases
103 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
9.0%
2
PLOS Neglected Tropical Diseases
378 papers in training set
Top 1%
8.3%
3
The Journal of Infectious Diseases
182 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
8.3%
4
The American Journal of Tropical Medicine and Hygiene
60 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
6.2%
5
The Lancet Infectious Diseases
71 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
4.1%
6
BMC Infectious Diseases
118 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
3.9%
7
BMC Public Health
147 papers in training set
Top 1%
3.9%
8
One Health
29 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
3.5%
9
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 45%
2.6%
10
Epidemics
104 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
2.0%
50% of probability mass above
11
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 51%
2.0%
12
BMJ Open
554 papers in training set
Top 8%
2.0%
13
American Journal of Epidemiology
57 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
1.9%
14
Journal of Travel Medicine
18 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
1.8%
15
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
2130 papers in training set
Top 33%
1.7%
16
Clinical Infectious Diseases
231 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.7%
17
Nature Communications
4913 papers in training set
Top 52%
1.7%
18
The Lancet Global Health
24 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
1.7%
19
eLife
5422 papers in training set
Top 44%
1.6%
20
Viruses
318 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.5%
21
International Journal of Infectious Diseases
126 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.3%
22
Epidemiology and Infection
84 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.2%
23
PLOS Medicine
98 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.2%
24
Eurosurveillance
80 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.9%
25
Travel Medicine and Infectious Disease
15 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
0.9%
26
The Lancet Microbe
43 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.9%
27
Science
429 papers in training set
Top 18%
0.9%
28
BMJ Global Health
98 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.9%
29
Science Advances
1098 papers in training set
Top 27%
0.9%
30
BMC Medicine
163 papers in training set
Top 6%
0.8%