Back

SCOPE: AI-Assisted Early Detection of Potentially Curable Pancreatic Neoplasms on CT from Local and Global Information

Oviedo, F.; Lopez Ramirez, F.; Blanco, A.; Facciola, J.; Kwak, S.; Zhao, J. M.; Syailendra, E. A.; Tixier, F.; Dodhia, R.; Hruban, R. H.; Weeks, W. B.; Lavista Ferres, J. M.; Chu, L. C.; Fishman, E. K.

2026-02-05 radiology and imaging
10.64898/2026.02.04.26345495 medRxiv
Show abstract

PurposeTo develop SCOPE (Small-lesion COntextual Pancreatic Evaluator), a deep learning model designed to improve CT detection of small pancreatic lesions--pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC), pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors (PanNETs), and cystic lesions--by integrating voxel-level features with global context. Materials and MethodsThis retrospective study used three independent datasets. A development cohort of 4,065 contrast-enhanced CT scans was used to train a deep neural network that performs pancreas, ductal, and lesion segmentation with an integrated classification head. A metamodel combined segmentation-derived and global contextual signals for case-level prediction. Performance was assessed on (1) an internal holdout test set (n = 605), (2) an external multi-institutional PDAC dataset from the PANORAMA challenge (n = 2,238), and (3) an expert-curated small-lesion reader study (n = 200). Areas under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUCs) were compared using DeLong test; sensitivities and specificities using McNemars test. ResultsOn the internal test set, SCOPE improved lesion-versus-normal AUC compared with the best segmentation baseline (0.974 [95% CI: 0.964, 0.984] vs 0.956; P = .006) and increased small-lesion sensitivity at 95% specificity (0.727 [95% CI: 0.653, 0.801] vs 0.600; P = .012). Performance gains were observed across lesion classes, with significant improvements for PDAC and PanNET detection. On the external dataset, SCOPE improved PDAC-versus-non-PDAC AUC (0.978 vs 0.861, P < .001) and achieved higher sensitivity at 90% and 95% specificity without retraining. For the small-lesion reader study, SCOPE achieved lesion-versus-normal AUC of 0.922 and performed within the range of subspecialty abdominal radiologists; SCOPE provided the correct diagnosis in 14.5% (29/200) of cases in which two or more readers were incorrect. ConclusionSCOPE improves early detection of small, potentially curable, pancreatic lesions on CT by combining local segmentation and global pancreatic context. Its consistent performance across internal, external, and reader datasets supports potential use as a concurrent reader for earlier and more accurate pancreatic lesion detection.

Matching journals

The top 6 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
European Radiology
14 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
22.8%
2
Diagnostics
48 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
8.5%
3
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 12%
7.3%
4
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 33%
4.4%
5
Nature Communications
4913 papers in training set
Top 36%
4.2%
6
Annals of Translational Medicine
17 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
3.6%
50% of probability mass above
7
The Lancet Digital Health
25 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
3.6%
8
Medical Physics
14 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
3.6%
9
PLOS Digital Health
91 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
2.9%
10
eBioMedicine
130 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
2.6%
11
npj Digital Medicine
97 papers in training set
Top 2%
2.5%
12
JAMA Network Open
127 papers in training set
Top 1%
2.5%
13
npj Precision Oncology
48 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
2.1%
14
JCO Clinical Cancer Informatics
18 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
1.7%
15
Ultrasound in Medicine & Biology
10 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.7%
16
Stroke: Vascular and Interventional Neurology
13 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
1.7%
17
Photoacoustics
11 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.7%
18
PLOS Computational Biology
1633 papers in training set
Top 18%
1.3%
19
Journal for ImmunoTherapy of Cancer
64 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
1.1%
20
Heliyon
146 papers in training set
Top 4%
1.1%
21
SLAS Technology
11 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.0%
22
IEEE Access
31 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
1.0%
23
Journal of Medical Imaging
11 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
0.9%
24
Frontiers in Medicine
113 papers in training set
Top 7%
0.8%
25
Frontiers in Oncology
95 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.8%
26
Nature Medicine
117 papers in training set
Top 6%
0.7%
27
BMJ Open
554 papers in training set
Top 14%
0.5%
28
Journal of Magnetic Resonance Imaging
14 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
0.5%