Back

Hepatitis C virus replication fitness as a determinant of antiviral therapy outcome

Seong, H.-G. T.; Arand, T.; Foerster, C.; Boehm, M.; Heger, E.; McLauchlan, J.; Sarrazin, C.; Dietz, J.; Kaiser, R.; Lohmann, V.; Rothhaar, P.

2026-02-04 microbiology
10.64898/2026.02.03.703674 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Background and AimsHepatitis C virus (HCV) infections were previously treated with interferon (IFN) but today direct acting antivirals (DAAs) with cure rates >95% are available. DAA treatment failure is primarily attributed to resistance associated mutations (RAMs), often imposing a fitness cost. Interferon treatment outcome was shown to be associated with the interferon sensitivity determining region (ISDR), which is part of the replication enhancing domain (ReED) in non-structural protein (NS) 5A. We found that accumulation of mutations in the ReED was indicative of elevated viral genome replication fitness. This study investigates the impact of HCV replication fitness on antiviral treatment outcomes. MethodsWe utilized chimeric HCV subgenomic replicons containing RAMs and ReED sequences from patients after interferon treatment or DAA failure to assess replication fitness of patient isolates in presence and absence of inhibitors. ResultsReplication fitness did not impact on IFN sensitivity in cell culture but resulted in higher remaining antigen levels for highly replicating variants at a given IFN concentration. Furthermore, we identified ReED variants substantially increasing HCV replication in several patients who failed DAA therapy across different genotypes. High replicator ReEDs rescued the fitness loss caused by RAMs like Y93C/H (NS5A) and S282T (NS5B). While high replication fitness did not intrinsically increase drug sensitivity (IC50), it allowed the virus to sustain robust replication despite antiviral pressure. ConclusionsElevated replication fitness might support interferon treatment due to increased antigen presentation, facilitating adaptive immune responses. Furthermore, ReED mediated increase in replication fitness could contribute to DAA treatment failure by preserving higher replication upon treatment and compensating for RAM associated fitness costs. Thus, patients failing DAA treatment should be monitored for RAMs and ReED mutations.

Matching journals

The top 9 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Journal of General Virology
46 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
12.1%
2
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 26%
6.7%
3
Journal of Virology
456 papers in training set
Top 1.0%
6.3%
4
Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy
167 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
6.3%
5
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 25%
4.8%
6
Antiviral Research
49 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
4.2%
7
The Journal of Infectious Diseases
182 papers in training set
Top 1%
3.5%
8
Journal of Medical Virology
137 papers in training set
Top 1.0%
3.5%
9
Wellcome Open Research
57 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
3.2%
50% of probability mass above
10
PLOS Computational Biology
1633 papers in training set
Top 12%
2.6%
11
Journal of Clinical Virology
62 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
2.4%
12
PeerJ
261 papers in training set
Top 5%
2.0%
13
BMC Infectious Diseases
118 papers in training set
Top 2%
2.0%
14
Viruses
318 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.9%
15
Clinical Infectious Diseases
231 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.8%
16
mBio
750 papers in training set
Top 8%
1.7%
17
Journal of Infection
71 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.6%
18
Virus Evolution
140 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
1.6%
19
mSphere
281 papers in training set
Top 4%
1.5%
20
Frontiers in Cellular and Infection Microbiology
98 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.5%
21
eLife
5422 papers in training set
Top 48%
1.3%
22
Nature Communications
4913 papers in training set
Top 55%
1.3%
23
Journal of Clinical Microbiology
120 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.2%
24
Frontiers in Pharmacology
100 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.2%
25
Journal of Clinical Medicine
91 papers in training set
Top 5%
0.9%
26
PLOS Pathogens
721 papers in training set
Top 8%
0.9%
27
Open Forum Infectious Diseases
134 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.8%
28
Clinical Microbiology and Infection
60 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.7%
29
Virus Research
36 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.7%
30
Journal of Antimicrobial Chemotherapy
43 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
0.7%