Back

Investigating the Conformational Flexibility of Staphylokinase Across Multiple Time Scales

Legrand, A. P.; Kasiarova, L.; Verma, N.; Mican, J.; Planas Iglesias, J.; Kohout, P.; Strunga, A.; Kucera, J.; Henek, T.; Vanacek, P.; de Martines, T.; Kaderavek, P.; Zidek, L.; Damborsky, J.; Mazurenko, S.; Bednar, D.; Hernychova, L.; Prokop, Z.; Marek, M.

2026-02-06 biochemistry
10.64898/2026.02.03.703606 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Cardiovascular diseases, including ischemic stroke, necessitate improved thrombolytic agents. A microbe-encoded plasminogen activator staphylokinase (SAK) is a promising alternative to the widely used tissue plasminogen activator (tPA) due to its high fibrin specificity and low production cost. To overcome potential immunogenicity hampering its use in clinical settings, the low-immunogenic variants SAK SY155 and SAK THR174 were previously engineered. However, the molecular basis underlying their reduced immunogenicity is not understood and requires detailed elucidation. Here, we determine molecular structures and compare flexibility between low-immunogenic and immunogenic SAK variants, using a combination of experimental and computational structural techniques. Our analyses show that all variants share the canonical SAK fold and retain similar plasminogen activation kinetics, despite the number of introduced substitutions. Crucially, the low-immunogenic variants exhibit distinct flexibility profiles, with SAK THR174 showing substantially increased flexibility in the H1 helix and B3 region. SAK SY155 exhibits an increased flexibility in the H1-B3 loop and propensity to homodimerize. These flexibility changes are found in the known immunogenic epitopes. Our multi-scale flexibility analysis provides the molecular explanation for the reduced immunogenicity, altered thermostability, and retained fibrinolytic function of the engineered variants. This information is critical for the design of next-generation thrombolytics.

Matching journals

The top 4 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.