Back

Control of motility and cell shape of Haloferax volcanii is linked by a transcriptional regulator

Nussbaum, P.; Grueneberger, F.; Neuschuetz, F.; Chou, K.; Sivabalasarma, S.; Eulitz, A.; Sailer, A.-L.; Vogl, K.; Exterkate, M.; He, W.; Marchfelder, A.; Grohmann, D.; Albers, S.-V.

2026-02-03 microbiology
10.64898/2026.02.03.703544 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Archaea rely on motility and morphological plasticity to navigate their environments, yet the transcriptional regulation of these processes remains poorly understood. In Haloferax volcanii, archaellum-dependent motility is transcriptionally regulated, but an EarA-like master regulator is absent. Here, we identify CsmR as a transcriptional regulator that links archaellum biogenesis and cell-shape transitions in H. volcanii. Deletion of csmR abolished detectable motility, whereas overexpression increased motility and promoted a sustained rod-like morphology. Comparative transcriptomics defined a CsmR-associated regulon that includes archaellum and chemotaxis genes as well as rod-shape determinants (e.g., Sph3 and RdfA), and upstream motif enrichment supports a direct role for CsmR in transcriptional control. Furthermore, csmR and cirA, a KaiC-like regulator, share extensive transcriptional overlap, with CirA likely fine-tuning CsmR-mediated regulation through post-translational modification. These findings establish CsmR as a key integrator of motility and cell shape regulation in Haloferax volcanii, suggesting that haloarchaea coordinate these fundamental processes through an unidentified transcriptional network. Moreover, Northern blotting and cell shape observation suggest that transcription factor RosR is involved in the regulation of an sRNA that shares extensive overlap with the cirA gene, possibly fine-tuning the effect of CirA on the regulation of the archaellum cluster and the rod shape determinants sph3 and rdfA. Understanding this interplay provides new insights into archaeal adaptability and may reveal broader regulatory principles in prokaryotic cell biology.

Matching journals

The top 7 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.