Back

Decoding ATG9A Variation: A Comprehensive Structural Investigation of All Missense Variants

Utichi, M.; Marjault, H.-B.; Tiberti, M.; Papaleo, E.

2026-02-05 bioinformatics
10.64898/2026.02.03.703515 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Macroautophagy (hereafter autophagy) is a cellular recycling pathway that requires different ATG (autophagy-related) proteins to generate double-membraned autophagosomes. ATG9A, a multi-spanning membrane protein, plays a crucial role in this process as the only transmembrane component of the core autophagy machinery. ATG9A functions as a lipid scramblase, redistributing lipids between membrane leaflets for the expanding autophagosome membrane. Structural studies have revealed that ATG9A forms a homotrimer with an interlocked domain-swapped architecture and a network of internal hydrophilic cavities. This configuration underlies its role in lipid transfer and membrane remodeling together with the lipid transporter ATG2A. ATG9A dysfunction has also been linked to human disease, as specific ATG9A mutations cause neurodevelopmental or neurodegenerative phenotypes. Additionally, ATG9A is altered in cancer, promoting pro-tumorigenic traits. However, most missense variants in ATG9A remain uncharacterized, posing a significant challenge for interpreting genomic data. In this study, we employed in silico saturation mutagenesis approach using the MAVISp (Multi-layered Assessment of VarIants by Structure) framework to predict the impact of every missense mutation in ATG9A. By analyzing multiple structural assemblies of ATG9A (monomer, trimer, and the ATG9A-ATG2A complex), we evaluated diverse mechanistic indicators of variant impact, including protein stability, long-range conformational changes, effects on multimerization interfaces, and alterations in post-translational modifications. We integrated the structure-based predictions with Variant Effect Predictors from recent deep-learning or evolutionary-based models and cross-referenced known variants catalogued in ClinVar, COSMIC, and cBioPortal. Finally, we predicted mechanistic indicators for all possible variants with structural coverage not yet reported in the disease-related databases supported by MAVISp. Our analyses identified a group of potentially damaging variants in ATG9A and the possible molecular mechanisms underlying their effects. Together, this work provides a roadmap for interpreting missense variants in autophagy regulators and highlights specific ATG9A mutations that deserve further investigation in the context of human disease.

Matching journals

The top 3 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Autophagy
32 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
26.6%
2
Nature Communications
4913 papers in training set
Top 2%
23.2%
3
Nucleic Acids Research
1128 papers in training set
Top 5%
3.7%
50% of probability mass above
4
The American Journal of Human Genetics
206 papers in training set
Top 1%
3.2%
5
Computational and Structural Biotechnology Journal
216 papers in training set
Top 2%
2.8%
6
Genome Medicine
154 papers in training set
Top 3%
2.7%
7
PLOS Computational Biology
1633 papers in training set
Top 13%
2.1%
8
eLife
5422 papers in training set
Top 35%
2.1%
9
PLOS Genetics
756 papers in training set
Top 8%
1.7%
10
Cell Systems
167 papers in training set
Top 7%
1.7%
11
Journal of Molecular Biology
217 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.7%
12
Communications Biology
886 papers in training set
Top 12%
1.4%
13
Cell Genomics
162 papers in training set
Top 4%
1.4%
14
Briefings in Bioinformatics
326 papers in training set
Top 4%
1.4%
15
Genomics, Proteomics & Bioinformatics
171 papers in training set
Top 4%
1.4%
16
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
2130 papers in training set
Top 39%
1.1%
17
Advanced Science
249 papers in training set
Top 15%
1.0%
18
Structure
175 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.9%
19
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 70%
0.9%
20
International Journal of Molecular Sciences
453 papers in training set
Top 14%
0.8%
21
iScience
1063 papers in training set
Top 28%
0.8%
22
Bioinformatics Advances
184 papers in training set
Top 5%
0.8%
23
Cell Reports
1338 papers in training set
Top 33%
0.7%
24
Cell Research
49 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.7%
25
Genome Biology
555 papers in training set
Top 8%
0.7%
26
Bioinformatics
1061 papers in training set
Top 10%
0.7%
27
Life Science Alliance
263 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.7%
28
EMBO reports
136 papers in training set
Top 8%
0.5%
29
Disease Models & Mechanisms
119 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.5%