Back

On the Use of Double Mutant Cycles to Probe the Molecular Interactions in Biomolecular Condensates

Rauh, A. S.; Tesei, G.; Lindorff-Larsen, K.

2026-02-05 biophysics
10.64898/2026.02.03.703500 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Disordered proteins can form biomolecular condensates by demixing from their environment, enabling reversible compartmentalisation of cellular components in the form of membraneless organelles. Multivalent interactions are essential for this type of phase separation behaviour, and for disordered proteins, the potential for multivalent interactions is encoded in the sequence composition and patterning. Mutational studies have been instrumental in helping elucidate this sequence grammar by perturbing the amino acid sequence and quantifying the resulting changes in the driving force for phase separation. While such studies have provided a detailed and predictive understanding of the driving forces for phase separation, they strictly do not inform on the nature of the interactions that drive phase separation. Here, we propose using double mutant cycles to explore molecular interactions and their contributions to condensate properties more directly. We explore the applicability of double mutant cycles for different types of interactions in condensates formed by the low-complexity domain of hnRNPA1 using coarse-grained molecular dynamics simulations. We find that the interactions between arginine and tyrosine residues, as well as between aromatic residues, contribute mostly additively to the propensity for phase separation. However, for the interactions between charged residues, we find that--in an interplay with the net charge of the protein--there is a measurable non-additive contribution to the phase separation propensity. Based on our results, we envisage that double mutant cycles could provide additional insights into protein phase separation, thus expanding the understanding of the sequence grammar and the underlying molecular interactions.

Matching journals

The top 5 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Biophysical Journal
545 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
22.4%
2
The Journal of Physical Chemistry B
158 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
10.4%
3
The Journal of Physical Chemistry Letters
58 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
8.4%
4
Journal of Chemical Theory and Computation
126 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
7.1%
5
Journal of Chemical Information and Modeling
207 papers in training set
Top 1%
3.9%
50% of probability mass above
6
The Journal of Chemical Physics
49 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
3.9%
7
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 31%
3.9%
8
Chemical Science
71 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
3.8%
9
Journal of the American Chemical Society
199 papers in training set
Top 2%
3.6%
10
PLOS Computational Biology
1633 papers in training set
Top 11%
3.1%
11
Physical Biology
43 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
1.9%
12
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
2130 papers in training set
Top 31%
1.8%
13
Physical Chemistry Chemical Physics
34 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
1.7%
14
eLife
5422 papers in training set
Top 42%
1.7%
15
Frontiers in Molecular Biosciences
100 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.7%
16
Protein Science
221 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
1.7%
17
Computational and Structural Biotechnology Journal
216 papers in training set
Top 5%
1.7%
18
Biochemistry
130 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.1%
19
Nucleic Acids Research
1128 papers in training set
Top 15%
0.9%
20
Journal of Molecular Biology
217 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.8%
21
Nature Communications
4913 papers in training set
Top 61%
0.8%
22
iScience
1063 papers in training set
Top 29%
0.8%
23
JACS Au
35 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.7%
24
Physical Review E
95 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.7%
25
Nano Letters
63 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.7%
26
Soft Matter
50 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
0.7%
27
Journal of The Royal Society Interface
189 papers in training set
Top 5%
0.6%