Back

The glycan shield of alphaherpesvirus glycoprotein B modulates host co-receptor binding

Krepel, S. T.; Rodrigues Ianiski, F.; Janssen, B. J. C.; Snijder, J.

2026-02-03 biochemistry
10.64898/2026.02.03.703472 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Alphaherpesviruses can infect a wide range of cell types and are notorious for their neurotropism. They enter cells through the fusion activity of the essential viral glycoprotein gB. Interactions of gB with co-receptors Myelin Associated Glycoprotein (MAG), paired immunoglobulin-like type 2 receptor alpha (PILR) and Non-muscle Myosin Heavy Chain IIA (NMHC-IIA) influence cell tropism and infectivity. Both MAG and PILR are known to bind to sialic acids, highlighting the potential role for gB glycosylation in mediating the co-receptor interactions. Here, using glycoproteomics, cryo electron microscopy and surface plasmon resonance, we study the specificity of the three co-receptor interactions with gB from herpes simplex virus type 1 (HSV-1), type 2 (HSV-2), and varicella zoster virus (VZV). We show that all gB variants are heterogeneously N-glycosylated at six or seven predicted sites with moderate degrees of sialylation, complemented with extensive O-linked glycosylation at the disordered N-terminus and a flexible loop within domain II. All three gB variants bind to MAG with similar affinity, mediated by sialic acids on gB O-glycans. In contrast, PILR binds only to HSV-1 and HSV-2, but not VZV gB. PILR binding is also mediated by sialic acids on gB O-glycans, of which we identify multiple candidate sites in HSV-1 and HSV-2, and none in VZV gB. NMHC-IIA binds to HSV-1 gB and HSV-2 gB with high affinity through a glycan-independent interaction, and not to VZV gB. These data reveal divergent co-receptor specificity and interaction strength and provide an improved biophysical basis to understand human neurotropic herpesvirus infection.

Matching journals

The top 6 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.