Back

No detrimental long-term impacts of coring on tree growth ormortality across European forests

Battison, R.; Ovenden, T. S.; Nemetschek, D.; Fischer, F. J.; Bouriaud, O.; Jucker, T.

2026-02-05 ecology
10.64898/2026.02.03.703454 bioRxiv
Show abstract

O_LITree cores are widely used across a broad range of disciplines in the environmental sciences, most notably as a tool to measure tree growth, estimate tree age, characterise wood anatomy and reconstruct past climate. However, because extracting tree cores is an invasive procedure, concerns about their use are often raised due to perceived risks for tree health. C_LIO_LIHere we comprehensively test the long-term impacts of tree coring on 16 European tree species using a dataset spanning the entire European continent. Over the course of a decade, we tracked the growth and survival of 3334 trees cored in 2012 (including trees cored once and twice) and compared them to that of a cohort of 7413 neighbouring trees that were never cored. C_LIO_LIWe found no evidence that coring had a detrimental impact on either the growth or survival of trees, irrespective of their size, species, climatic environmental or the number of times they were cored. However, we did observe a small positive stem increment response (2.0% for trees cored once and 6.2% for trees cored twice), which we hypothesise is most likely the result of vertical scarring from the coring wound, with potential consequences for the accuracy of repeated diameter measurements collected at the same height. C_LIO_LIOur study supports the use of tree coring as a low-impact method for characterising the growth, age and function of a wide range of tree species. However, to avoid biasing long-term forest census measurements, tree cores should always be collected well above or below the point of measurement of tree stem diameters. C_LI

Matching journals

The top 4 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Forest Ecology and Management
25 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
32.8%
2
Science of The Total Environment
179 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
8.3%
3
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 12%
7.1%
4
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 25%
6.8%
50% of probability mass above
5
Methods in Ecology and Evolution
160 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
6.3%
6
Global Change Biology
69 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
3.6%
7
Nature Communications
4913 papers in training set
Top 40%
3.6%
8
Journal of Environmental Management
11 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
3.0%
9
Ecological Indicators
20 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
2.4%
10
Ecology and Evolution
232 papers in training set
Top 2%
2.1%
11
Biological Conservation
43 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
1.7%
12
PLANTS, PEOPLE, PLANET
21 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
1.5%
13
Environmental Research Letters
15 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
1.5%
14
Peer Community Journal
254 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.9%
15
Communications Earth & Environment
14 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
0.9%
16
eLife
5422 papers in training set
Top 54%
0.9%
17
Plant, Cell & Environment
78 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.8%
18
Remote Sensing in Ecology and Conservation
10 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
0.8%
19
Journal of Applied Ecology
35 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
0.7%
20
Communications Biology
886 papers in training set
Top 24%
0.7%
21
Royal Society Open Science
193 papers in training set
Top 5%
0.7%
22
Ecosphere
53 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
0.7%
23
Tree Physiology
21 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
0.7%
24
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
2130 papers in training set
Top 46%
0.7%
25
PeerJ
261 papers in training set
Top 18%
0.6%