Back

Model-Driven Hybrid AI Framework for End-to-End Autonomous Decision-Making in Drug Development

Lee, H.; Kang, H.; Jung, W.; Cho, H.; Goo, S.; Yun, H.-y.; Kim, M.-G.; CHAE, J.-w.; Park, S.-M.; Lee, S.; Kim, J. H.; Jung, S.

2026-02-06 pharmacology and toxicology
10.64898/2026.02.03.703154 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Decision-making in drug development spans heterogeneous stages from molecular design to clinical optimization, yet computer-aided workflows across stages remain fragmented, limiting traceability from evidence-derived clinical questions to simulation scenarios and decision endpoints. We present a model-driven hybrid AI framework for end-to-end decision support that treats PICO (Participants, Intervention, Comparison, Outcome) as a machine-actionable specification to define scenarios and align endpoints across modules. Given a PICO-defined clinical question and a drug SMILES, the framework infers PBPK-ready parameters from structure, generates exposure via mechanistic PBPK simulation, and links exposure outputs to clinic-facing therapeutic drug monitoring (TDM) decision support using an open-source NLME-based Clinical Pharmacokinetic Consultant Service (CPCS). We additionally implement an LLM-based PICO extraction layer to structure clinical abstracts into P/I/C/O elements for systematic evidence ingestion. Results include backbone verification for DTI-guided intrinsic clearance prediction under fold-error bounds and PBPK trajectory plausibility, and external validation of the hybrid AI-PBPK pipeline showing substantial dispersion for several endpoints. An input-controlled comparison between PhysioSim and PK-Sim on N = 9 drugs yields similarly degraded accuracy under identical AI-predicted inputs, suggesting upstream parameter quality as a dominant constraint. For evidence ingestion, prompting-only PICO extraction achieves F1 of 0.687 on EBM-NLP and 0.552 on TB-PICO. For clinical utility, CPCS improves TDM performance over a PKS baseline on phenobarbital and vancomycin, reducing MAPE by approximately 26-60% depending on configuration. Overall, the framework provides a modular, traceable blueprint linking evidence-defined questions to exposure simulation and TDM decision support while preserving mechanistic interpretability. Future work will integrate outcome-aligned time-to-event modeling and federated learning to close the PICO-to-outcome loop and improve parameter inference under multi-site governance.

Matching journals

The top 8 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.