Longitudinal Dynamics and Site-Specific Recovery of the Human Respiratory Microbiome Following Smoking Cessation
Gschwendtner, S.; Kovacevic, D.; Gaede, K.; Herzmann, C.; Overmann, J.; Schloter, M.; Krauss-Etschmann, S.
Show abstract
BackgroundThe human respiratory tract harbours diverse microbial communities crucial for health, but their dynamics during environmental perturbations like smoking remain poorly understood. While smoking is a major risk factor for various diseases, its compartment-specific effects on the respiratory microbiome and potential recovery following cessation have not been fully elucidated. Here, we present a longitudinal, multi-site study of respiratory microbiome dynamics in smokers undergoing cessation, benchmarked against healthy never-smokers. MethodsUsing standardized sampling of the anterior nares, oropharynx, and bronchoalveolar lavage (BAL), combined with 16S rRNA gene amplicon sequencing and rigorous contamination controls, we characterized community composition, diversity, personalization, and microbial interactions across airway compartments. ResultsSmokers exhibited pronounced microbiome alterations: nasal richness increased, while lung richness and core taxa were reduced. Smoking-induced changes were compartment-specific and most pronounced in nose and lung. The degree of individuum-specific differences in community structure was elevated in smokers and correlated with smoking intensity and duration. Short-term cessation (6 weeks) led to minor shifts in taxa abundance but increased similarity between oropharyngeal and lung communities, whereas long-term cessation (1 year) resulted in partial restoration, particularly in lung and nasal microbiomes. Some taxa, including Haemophilus and Prevotella_7, showed persistent alterations, highlighting lasting smoking effects. Network analyses revealed that smoking disrupted microbial co-occurrence and reduced community connectivity, whereas cessation partially restored interaction networks, with dynamics differing between oropharynx and lung, reflecting different underlying ecological assembly processes. Recovery trajectories were highly individualized, with lung microbiomes influenced by deterministic processes and upper airway microbiomes shaped by stochastic factors, explaining site-specific responses and the persistence of personalized microbial signatures. ConclusionThese results provide the first time-resolved, multi-compartment characterization of respiratory microbiome recovery after smoking cessation, revealing that smoking leaves long-lasting, site-specific imprints on airway microbial communities and interactions. Our findings underscore the need for individual and compartment-specific approaches when designing microbiome-based interventions to support respiratory health.
Matching journals
The top 8 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Cross-feeding interactions between Fusobacterium nucleatum and the glycan forager Segatella oris 92%
- Temporal dynamics of gut microbiomes in non-industrialized urban Amazonia 92%
- Longitudinal Long-Read Microbiome Profiling in a Canine Model Reveals How Age, Diet, and Birth Mode Shape Gut Community Dynamics 92%
Similar papers in this journal
- A prevalent and culturable microbiota links ecological balance to clinical stability of the human lung after transplantation 95%
- Microbial community organization designates distinct pulmonary exacerbation types and predicts treatment outcome in cystic fibrosis 94%
- Mechanical ventilation affects respiratory microbiome of COVID-19 patients and its interactions with the host 93%
Similar papers in this journal
Similar papers in this journal
- Dynamics of Bacterial and Viral Transmission in Experimental Microbiota Transplantation 92%
- Halophilic microbial community compositional shift after a rare rainfall in the Atacama Desert 91%
- Amino acid auxotrophies in human gut bacteria are linked to higher microbiome diversity and long-term stability 91%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.