Back

Label-Free, Physics-Constrained Learning for Multi-Exposure Speckle Imaging Parameter Estimation

Lu, H.; Ashbrook, J.; Dunn, A. K.

2026-02-05 neuroscience
10.64898/2026.02.03.700085 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Multi-exposure speckle imaging (MESI) estimates flow-related parameters by fitting a physics-based speckle contrast model to measurements acquired over multiple exposure times. In standard pipelines, parameters are recovered via nonlinear least-squares fitting at each pixel, which is computationally expensive and can yield spatially inconsistent maps when uncertainty in the estimated speckle contrast variance [Formula] (from camera noise and finite spatial/temporal sampling used to compute speckle contrast) is amplified by independent pixel wise inversion. This work reframes MESI parameter estimation as identification of a globally shared inverse operator of the analytical forward model, exploiting the fact that a single physical mapping governs all pixels while noise drives large variance in independent pixel wise inversion. Rather than solving millions of iterative optimizations, a single parameterized inverse mapping is learned directly from a single acquired MESI dataset. Physics consistency is enforced by embedding the fixed MESI forward model as an analysis-by-synthesis layer that re-synthesizes speckle contrast curves from the predicted parameters. Training is self-supervised: the inverse mapping is optimized by minimizing a reconstruction loss between measured and re-synthesized speckle contrast curves, which constrains estimates to the set of physically admissible MESI curves without requiring ground truth parameter labels. Experiments on a numerical MESI phantom with known ground truth and on in vivo mouse cortex data show that the proposed method produces more stable inverse correlation time (ICT) maps (1/{tau}c) and improved spatial coherence relative to conventional per-pixel fitting, while substantially reducing inference time by replacing iterative optimization with a single feed-forward evaluation.

Matching journals

The top 6 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging
18 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
18.9%
2
NeuroImage
813 papers in training set
Top 1%
8.5%
3
Optica
25 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
7.3%
4
Nature Communications
4913 papers in training set
Top 24%
7.3%
5
Biomedical Optics Express
84 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
6.5%
6
Optics Letters
13 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
4.9%
50% of probability mass above
7
Imaging Neuroscience
242 papers in training set
Top 1%
3.6%
8
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 35%
3.6%
9
Nature Methods
336 papers in training set
Top 3%
3.6%
10
Medical Image Analysis
33 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
2.8%
11
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 47%
2.1%
12
PLOS Computational Biology
1633 papers in training set
Top 13%
2.1%
13
Photoacoustics
11 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
2.1%
14
eLife
5422 papers in training set
Top 39%
1.8%
15
IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering
38 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
1.8%
16
Communications Biology
886 papers in training set
Top 8%
1.7%
17
Advanced Science
249 papers in training set
Top 11%
1.7%
18
Magnetic Resonance in Medicine
72 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
1.2%
19
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
2130 papers in training set
Top 41%
0.9%
20
Journal of Biophotonics
16 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
0.9%
21
Neurophotonics
37 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
0.8%
22
Journal of Neuroscience Methods
106 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.8%
23
Science Advances
1098 papers in training set
Top 29%
0.8%
24
Light: Science & Applications
16 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
0.7%
25
Bioinformatics
1061 papers in training set
Top 10%
0.7%
26
Nature Biomedical Engineering
42 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.7%
27
International Journal of Molecular Sciences
453 papers in training set
Top 17%
0.7%
28
Bioengineering
24 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.5%
29
Human Brain Mapping
295 papers in training set
Top 5%
0.5%
30
Journal of Microscopy
18 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
0.5%