Back

Genetic characterization of a Citrobacter braakii isolate possessing blaNDM-1 obtained from toilet bowl water in a tertiary healthcare-associated facility in North Macedonia.

Yagi, N.; Miyazato, S.; Cana, F.; Demiri, I.; Cvetanovska, M.; Eftimovski, G.; Dimzova, M.; Hirai, I.

2026-02-05 infectious diseases
10.64898/2026.02.03.26345508 medRxiv
Show abstract

Carbapenem-resistant (CR) bacteria have emerged and been spreading beyond healthcare-associated facilities into the environment. It is recognized that toilet bowl water in patient rooms of healthcare-associated facilities can be one of internal reservoirs of CR bacteria. In accordance with this idea, toilet bowl water samples were collected from patient rooms in a tertiary healthcare-associated facility in North Macedonia, and meropenem (MEM)-resistant bacterial isolates were obtained from the toilet bowl water. In this study, because a MEM-resistant C. braakii isolate, that was one of MEM-resistant opportunistic pathogens, was obtained from the toilet water, whole-genome sequencing (WGS) of this isolate was performed to obtain genetic characteristics of the blaNDM-1-positive C. braakii isolate. By the WGS, four contigs were constructed, the longest contig, contig 1 (5,189,681 bp), contained blaCTX-M with some additional antimicrobial-resistance genes (ARGs). Interestingly, blaNDM-1 was detected in contig 2 (177,260 bp) and contig 3 (64,168 bp). Plasmid replicon of contig 2 was IncA/C2 but plasmid replicon of contig 3 was IncN and different from one of contig 2. Genetic structures surrounding blaNDM-1 were different between these two blaNDM-1-positive plasmids implying transfer or insertion of blaNDM-1 had occurred by IS or other mechanism. Further molecular epidemiology will be needed to explain the mechanism that allowed the C. braakii isolate to possess two structurally different blaNDM-1 plasmids.

Matching journals

The top 11 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.