Back

Haptic Portable Robotic Device for Automated Guidewire or Catheter Navigation in Endovascular Procedures

Mohammadi, V.; MacTaggart, J.; Jadidi, M.; Kamenskiy, A.

2026-02-05 surgery
10.64898/2026.02.03.26345465 medRxiv
Show abstract

PurposeEndovascular therapy is preferred over open surgery due to its minimally invasive nature, faster recovery, and lower perioperative risk; however, fluoroscopy guided procedures are limited by radiation exposure, high equipment costs, and reliance on highly skilled operators. This study aims to develop and evaluate a lightweight, portable robotic system for autonomous guidewire navigation to improve safety, accessibility, and operator independence. MethodsA compact 400 g robotic device was designed with millimeter scale positioning accuracy, servo current based real-time haptic feedback, precise axial rotation, automated retraction advance control, and compatibility with standard endovascular tools. Miniature linear actuated servomotors replicate skilled manual maneuvers using impedance control. Upon tip contact, the system advances the guidewire by 1 mm, measures current changes, classifies lesion stiffness (soft, medium, stiff), and adapts virtual mass-spring-damper gains to regulate push speed and applied force. Bench experiments were conducted using flexible tubing with inserts simulating 20-80% stenosis and two current thresholds (75 mA and 94 mA). ResultsRetraction frequency increased with stenosis severity, validating the autonomous control strategy. Lesion stiffness classification achieved F-scores of 0.83, 0.77, and 0.95 for soft, medium, and stiff conditions, respectively, demonstrating reliable discrimination and adaptive force modulation. ConclusionsThe proposed system enables autonomous and adaptive guidewire advancement with high classification accuracy using low-cost, current based sensing and impedance control. Its lightweight and portable design reduces dependence on continuous manual operation and specialized imaging infrastructure, supporting safer and faster interventions and potential deployment in prehospital or resource-limited settings. This prototype advances the development of more accessible and operator-independent endovascular therapy.

Matching journals

The top 4 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Annals of Biomedical Engineering
37 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
23.7%
2
PLOS ONE
5266 papers in training set
Top 13%
13.7%
3
Scientific Reports
3612 papers in training set
Top 7%
7.9%
4
Journal of the American Heart Association
140 papers in training set
Top 1%
5.9%
50% of probability mass above
5
Stroke: Vascular and Interventional Neurology
14 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
4.7%
6
Computers in Biology and Medicine
128 papers in training set
Top 1%
3.5%
7
npj Digital Medicine
118 papers in training set
Top 2%
2.6%
8
Biology Methods and Protocols
61 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
2.3%
9
Sensors
43 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
1.9%
10
Frontiers in Bioengineering and Biotechnology
98 papers in training set
Top 1.0%
1.9%
11
BMJ Open
601 papers in training set
Top 9%
1.8%
12
Biomedical Optics Express
95 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
1.8%
13
Journal of Biomechanical Engineering
20 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
1.6%
14
Advanced Materials Technologies
29 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
1.5%
15
PLOS Digital Health
106 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.5%
16
Medicine
31 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.5%
17
eLife
5828 papers in training set
Top 60%
1.1%
18
Trials
29 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
0.9%
19
Human Brain Mapping
329 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.9%
20
Ultrasound in Medicine & Biology
10 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
0.7%
21
IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering
40 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.7%
22
JMIR Research Protocols
21 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.7%
23
Diagnostics
50 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.7%
24
BMC Neurology
14 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
0.7%
25
Bioengineering
29 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.5%