Back

Haptic Portable Robotic Device for Automated Guidewire or Catheter Navigation in Endovascular Procedures

Mohammadi, V.; MacTaggart, J.; Jadidi, M.; Kamenskiy, A.

2026-02-05 surgery
10.64898/2026.02.03.26345465 medRxiv
Show abstract

PurposeEndovascular therapy is preferred over open surgery due to its minimally invasive nature, faster recovery, and lower perioperative risk; however, fluoroscopy guided procedures are limited by radiation exposure, high equipment costs, and reliance on highly skilled operators. This study aims to develop and evaluate a lightweight, portable robotic system for autonomous guidewire navigation to improve safety, accessibility, and operator independence. MethodsA compact 400 g robotic device was designed with millimeter scale positioning accuracy, servo current based real-time haptic feedback, precise axial rotation, automated retraction advance control, and compatibility with standard endovascular tools. Miniature linear actuated servomotors replicate skilled manual maneuvers using impedance control. Upon tip contact, the system advances the guidewire by 1 mm, measures current changes, classifies lesion stiffness (soft, medium, stiff), and adapts virtual mass-spring-damper gains to regulate push speed and applied force. Bench experiments were conducted using flexible tubing with inserts simulating 20-80% stenosis and two current thresholds (75 mA and 94 mA). ResultsRetraction frequency increased with stenosis severity, validating the autonomous control strategy. Lesion stiffness classification achieved F-scores of 0.83, 0.77, and 0.95 for soft, medium, and stiff conditions, respectively, demonstrating reliable discrimination and adaptive force modulation. ConclusionsThe proposed system enables autonomous and adaptive guidewire advancement with high classification accuracy using low-cost, current based sensing and impedance control. Its lightweight and portable design reduces dependence on continuous manual operation and specialized imaging infrastructure, supporting safer and faster interventions and potential deployment in prehospital or resource-limited settings. This prototype advances the development of more accessible and operator-independent endovascular therapy.

Matching journals

The top 6 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 13%
14.5%
2
Annals of Biomedical Engineering
34 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
12.5%
3
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 9%
8.5%
4
Stroke: Vascular and Interventional Neurology
13 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
7.3%
5
Frontiers in Bioengineering and Biotechnology
88 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
6.4%
6
npj Digital Medicine
97 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
6.4%
50% of probability mass above
7
BMJ Open
554 papers in training set
Top 5%
4.0%
8
Frontiers in Medicine
113 papers in training set
Top 2%
3.1%
9
Biology Methods and Protocols
53 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
2.1%
10
PLOS Computational Biology
1633 papers in training set
Top 14%
1.9%
11
Journal of Neural Engineering
197 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.8%
12
Neurophotonics
37 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
1.7%
13
Journal of Biomechanics
57 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
1.7%
14
Computers in Biology and Medicine
120 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.7%
15
Trials
25 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
1.7%
16
Journal of Biomechanical Engineering
17 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.5%
17
Medicine
30 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.5%
18
Frontiers in Cardiovascular Medicine
49 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.5%
19
Journal of the American Heart Association
119 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.9%
20
Frontiers in Oncology
95 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.8%
21
Journal of Clinical Medicine
91 papers in training set
Top 6%
0.8%
22
Biomaterials
78 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.8%
23
BMC Biology
248 papers in training set
Top 6%
0.7%
24
British Journal of Anaesthesia
14 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.5%
25
BMC Medical Informatics and Decision Making
39 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.5%
26
JMIR Research Protocols
18 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.5%
27
Frontiers in Physiology
93 papers in training set
Top 8%
0.5%