Back

Using LIBRA-seq to map the BK-polyomavirus specific B-cell response in kidney transplant recipients

Marchand, S.; Trochel, A.; Loirat, M.; Mignon, J.; Letellier, T.; Braud, M.; Delbos, L.; Fourgeux, C.; Taouli, S.; Peltier, C.; Gautreau-Rolland, L.; Poschmann, J.; Blancho, G.; Saulquin, X.; Bressollette-Bodin, C.; McILROY, D.

2026-02-09 infectious diseases
10.64898/2026.02.03.26345220 medRxiv
Show abstract

BK polyomavirus (BKPyV) is a major complication in kidney transplant recipients (KTR), for whom no specific antiviral therapy is available. Modulation of immunosuppressive therapy results in virus clearance in most KTR with BKPyV DNAemia (controllers), but a significant minority fail to clear the virus (non-controllers). Here, we adapt LIBRA-seq, which links antibody sequence data to antigen specificity, to intact viral capsids of the four BKPyV genotypes to study and compare BKPyV-specific B-cell repertoires in controllers (n=8) versus non-controllers (n=3). Sequences were obtained for 5197 BKPyV-specific antibodies, and predicted antigen specificities were validated by ELISA and neutralizing assays (n=21 antibodies). We show that cross-genotype reactivity results from the recruitment of numerous broadly cross-reactive B-cell clones with preferential binding to the infecting genotype, making up 4,3% to 44,6% of the BKPyV-specific repertoire, while true broadly neutralizing antibodies are rare. The proportions of broadly-specific and isotype switched antibodies, rates of somatic hypermutation and repertoire diversity were comparable in both patient groups, indicating that there is no identifiable deficit in the humoral response mounted by BKPyV non-controllers, and supporting the notion that humoral immunity alone is insufficient to control established BKPyV replication. This work shows that LIBRA-seq can be successfully applied to a non-enveloped virus and provides a framework for analyzing antiviral B-cell repertoires and antibody specificity in clinically relevant settings. O_FIG O_LINKSMALLFIG WIDTH=200 HEIGHT=180 SRC="FIGDIR/small/26345220v1_ufig1.gif" ALT="Figure 1"> View larger version (44K): org.highwire.dtl.DTLVardef@18ef2b6org.highwire.dtl.DTLVardef@1e0b7a2org.highwire.dtl.DTLVardef@3822fcorg.highwire.dtl.DTLVardef@180deea_HPS_FORMAT_FIGEXP M_FIG C_FIG

Matching journals

The top 9 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Nature Communications
4913 papers in training set
Top 18%
10.0%
2
JCI Insight
241 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
8.3%
3
Cell Reports Methods
141 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
6.7%
4
eLife
5422 papers in training set
Top 14%
6.2%
5
Cell Reports
1338 papers in training set
Top 12%
4.3%
6
Transplantation
13 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
4.3%
7
iScience
1063 papers in training set
Top 4%
3.9%
8
American Journal of Transplantation
15 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
3.6%
9
Virus Evolution
140 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
3.5%
50% of probability mass above
10
PLOS Biology
408 papers in training set
Top 5%
3.0%
11
EMBO Molecular Medicine
85 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
2.7%
12
Nature Medicine
117 papers in training set
Top 1%
2.7%
13
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 46%
2.6%
14
Genome Medicine
154 papers in training set
Top 4%
2.1%
15
Cell Reports Medicine
140 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.9%
16
Journal of Clinical Investigation
164 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.8%
17
Journal of Experimental Medicine
106 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.7%
18
Frontiers in Immunology
586 papers in training set
Top 4%
1.6%
19
The Journal of Infectious Diseases
182 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.5%
20
Science Translational Medicine
111 papers in training set
Top 4%
1.3%
21
eBioMedicine
130 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.3%
22
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 63%
0.9%
23
Communications Biology
886 papers in training set
Top 19%
0.9%
24
Viruses
318 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.9%
25
Immunity
58 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.8%
26
Nature Immunology
71 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.8%
27
mBio
750 papers in training set
Top 11%
0.7%
28
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
2130 papers in training set
Top 46%
0.7%
29
Science Advances
1098 papers in training set
Top 33%
0.6%
30
Frontiers in Cellular and Infection Microbiology
98 papers in training set
Top 7%
0.6%