Back

Inequalities in cancer diagnostic outcomes for patients with a learning disability: a retrospective cohort study in England

Wiering, B.; Abel, G. A.; Farmer, L.; Kerrison, R.; Merriel, S. W. D.; Price, S. J.; Shotter, D.; Valderas, J. M.; Mounce, L. T. A.

2026-02-07 primary care research
10.64898/2026.02.03.26345112 medRxiv
Show abstract

ObjectivesThe cancer diagnostic process may be more complicated for patients with a learning disability ("intellectual disability" outside of the UK) than for other patients. We aimed to investigate whether patients with a learning disability were more likely to experience disadvantage in cancer diagnostic pathways and outcomes. DesignA retrospective cohort study using routinely collected linked data across primary and secondary care, and cancer registration. Setting1470 general practices in England. Participants277,050 participants who were aged 40+ years, had an incident cancer recorded in the cancer registration during 2012-2018 and were registered for at least three years at their general practice prior to diagnosis. Main outcome measuresEmergency presentation route to diagnosis or urgent suspected cancer referral route to diagnosis, cancer stage at diagnosis (early vs advanced) and all-cause mortality within 30 days after diagnosis. Results277,050 patients were included in the study, with 796 (0.3%) patients having a record of a learning disability. Patients with a learning disability were over twice as likely to be diagnosed via an emergency presentation (aOR:2.65, 95%CI:2.26-3.11, p<0.001), and half as likely to be diagnosed via an urgent suspected cancer referral (aOR:0.51, 95%CI:0.43-0.60, p<0.001). They were also more likely to be diagnosed with advanced-stage cancer (aOR:1.37, 95%CI:1.12-1.67, p=0.002), especially for breast cancer, and to die within 30 days of diagnosis (aOR:3.77, 95%CI:3.10-4.59, p<0.001) than patients without a learning disability. ConclusionsPatients with a learning disability experience marked inequalities in cancer diagnostic pathways and outcomes. The increased risk of advanced-stage breast cancer is of particular note. Improved support to access and navigate the health care system may be required to negate experienced difficulties during the diagnostic process. Summary boxO_ST_ABSWhat is already known on this topicC_ST_ABSO_LIPatients with learning disabilities experience avoidable mortality after a cancer diagnosis. C_LIO_LIGreater dependence on others, low symptom awareness and difficulties accessing and navigating the health care system during the cancer diagnostic process potentially contribute to worse outcomes, particularly for more severe learning disability. C_LI What this study addsO_LIConsidering all cancer sites except non-melanoma skin cancer, we found that having a record of a learning disability was associated with an increased likelihood of being diagnosed at an advanced stage, especially for breast cancer, and increased mortality within 30 days after diagnosis. C_LIO_LIPatients with a learning disability were more likely to be diagnosed as an emergency, and less likely to be diagnosed via an urgent suspected cancer referral. C_LI How this study might affect research, practice or policyO_LIPatients with a learning disability require better support to negate existing inequalities in diagnostic pathways and outcomes C_LI

Matching journals

The top 5 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
BMJ Open
554 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
28.3%
2
British Journal of Cancer
42 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
6.5%
3
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 26%
6.5%
4
British Journal of General Practice
22 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
5.0%
5
BJGP Open
12 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
4.4%
50% of probability mass above
6
The Lancet Digital Health
25 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
3.7%
7
Health Expectations
12 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
3.7%
8
BMC Medicine
163 papers in training set
Top 2%
3.1%
9
The Lancet Infectious Diseases
71 papers in training set
Top 1%
2.1%
10
BMJ Open Respiratory Research
32 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
1.8%
11
BMC Public Health
147 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.7%
12
BMJ Health & Care Informatics
13 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
1.7%
13
Journal of General Internal Medicine
20 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
1.5%
14
Communications Medicine
85 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
1.5%
15
International Journal of Cancer
42 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
1.5%
16
Journal of Psychosomatic Research
11 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
1.5%
17
Public Health Nutrition
14 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
1.4%
18
Cancers
200 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.4%
19
F1000Research
79 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.4%
20
BMC Cancer
52 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.3%
21
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 66%
1.3%
22
eClinicalMedicine
55 papers in training set
Top 1.0%
1.3%
23
PLOS Medicine
98 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.9%
24
Genetics in Medicine
69 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
0.9%
25
European Journal of Cancer
10 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
0.8%
26
The Lancet Regional Health - Americas
22 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
0.8%
27
Annals of Internal Medicine
27 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
0.8%
28
JAMA
17 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
0.8%
29
JAMA Network Open
127 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.8%
30
Journal of Medical Internet Research
85 papers in training set
Top 5%
0.7%