Inequalities in cancer diagnostic outcomes for patients with a learning disability: a retrospective cohort study in England
Wiering, B.; Abel, G. A.; Farmer, L.; Kerrison, R.; Merriel, S. W. D.; Price, S. J.; Shotter, D.; Valderas, J. M.; Mounce, L. T. A.
Show abstract
ObjectivesThe cancer diagnostic process may be more complicated for patients with a learning disability ("intellectual disability" outside of the UK) than for other patients. We aimed to investigate whether patients with a learning disability were more likely to experience disadvantage in cancer diagnostic pathways and outcomes. DesignA retrospective cohort study using routinely collected linked data across primary and secondary care, and cancer registration. Setting1470 general practices in England. Participants277,050 participants who were aged 40+ years, had an incident cancer recorded in the cancer registration during 2012-2018 and were registered for at least three years at their general practice prior to diagnosis. Main outcome measuresEmergency presentation route to diagnosis or urgent suspected cancer referral route to diagnosis, cancer stage at diagnosis (early vs advanced) and all-cause mortality within 30 days after diagnosis. Results277,050 patients were included in the study, with 796 (0.3%) patients having a record of a learning disability. Patients with a learning disability were over twice as likely to be diagnosed via an emergency presentation (aOR:2.65, 95%CI:2.26-3.11, p<0.001), and half as likely to be diagnosed via an urgent suspected cancer referral (aOR:0.51, 95%CI:0.43-0.60, p<0.001). They were also more likely to be diagnosed with advanced-stage cancer (aOR:1.37, 95%CI:1.12-1.67, p=0.002), especially for breast cancer, and to die within 30 days of diagnosis (aOR:3.77, 95%CI:3.10-4.59, p<0.001) than patients without a learning disability. ConclusionsPatients with a learning disability experience marked inequalities in cancer diagnostic pathways and outcomes. The increased risk of advanced-stage breast cancer is of particular note. Improved support to access and navigate the health care system may be required to negate experienced difficulties during the diagnostic process. Summary boxO_ST_ABSWhat is already known on this topicC_ST_ABSO_LIPatients with learning disabilities experience avoidable mortality after a cancer diagnosis. C_LIO_LIGreater dependence on others, low symptom awareness and difficulties accessing and navigating the health care system during the cancer diagnostic process potentially contribute to worse outcomes, particularly for more severe learning disability. C_LI What this study addsO_LIConsidering all cancer sites except non-melanoma skin cancer, we found that having a record of a learning disability was associated with an increased likelihood of being diagnosed at an advanced stage, especially for breast cancer, and increased mortality within 30 days after diagnosis. C_LIO_LIPatients with a learning disability were more likely to be diagnosed as an emergency, and less likely to be diagnosed via an urgent suspected cancer referral. C_LI How this study might affect research, practice or policyO_LIPatients with a learning disability require better support to negate existing inequalities in diagnostic pathways and outcomes C_LI
Matching journals
The top 5 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- The impact of worldwide, national and sub-national severity distributions in Burden of Disease studies: a case study of individual cancer types in Scotland 95%
- Attributing non-specific symptoms to cancer in general practice: a scoping review 95%
- Do people with disabilities experience disparities in cancer care? A systematic review 95%
Similar papers in this journal
- Challenges and facilitators in pathways to cancer diagnosis in Southern Africa: A qualitative study 94%
- The impact of the COVID-19 pandemic and related control measures on cancer diagnosis in Catalonia:A time-series analysis of primary care electronic health records covering about 5 million people. 94%
- Psychological Impact of the Galleri Test (sIG(n)al): Protocol for a longitudinal evaluation of the psychological impact of receiving a cancer signal in the NHS-Galleri Trial 93%
Similar papers in this journal
- Targeted encouragement of GP consultations for possible cancer symptoms: randomised controlled trial 93%
- Development and validation of a modified Cambridge Multimorbidity Score for use with internationally recognized electronic health record clinical terms (SNOMED CT) 92%
- Impact of COVID-19 on Migrants’ Access to Primary Care: A National Qualitative Study 92%
Similar papers in this journal
- A mixed-methods evaluation of patients’ views on primary care multi-disciplinary teams in Scotland 92%
- Community end-of-life care during the COVID-19 pandemic: Initial findings of a UK primary care survey 90%
- Patient characteristics associated with clinically coded long COVID: an OpenSAFELY study using electronic health records 90%
Similar papers in this journal
- Patient symptoms and experience following COVID-19: results from a UK wide survey 92%
- Post-COVID assessment in a specialist clinical service: a 12-month, single-centre analysis of symptoms and healthcare needs in 1325 individuals 91%
- Psychometric analysis of the modified Covid-19 Yorkshire Rehabilitation Scale (C19-YRSm) in a prospective multicentre study 90%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.