Gene sharing during enzyme recruitment reveals distinct adaptive strategies including massive, sustained duplication without divergence
Reid, C. Z.; Zorio, D. A. R.; Miller, B. G.
Show abstract
Organisms expand their metabolism by repurposing enzymes to perform new reactions. To be repurposed, an enzyme must balance its original and new functions if both contribute to fitness. If an enzyme cannot balance its functions, another candidate may take its place. Here, we used adaptive evolution on a glucokinase-deficient Escherichia coli containing four promiscuous surrogates to investigate enzyme recruitment when the preferred candidate, N-acetyl-D-mannosamine kinase (NanK), is under selective pressure to maintain its original function. We find that NanK is still recruited to restore glycolysis under conditions requiring both functions via two distinct mechanisms that leave native activity largely unaltered. In one mechanism, small-scale gene amplification precedes the appearance of two non-synonymous mutations in nanK that increase glucokinase activity but have little or no effect on N-acetyl-D-mannosamine kinase activity. In another mechanism, recruitment occurs via amplification of a [~]1000 base pair fragment that narrowly encompasses nanK and reaches copy numbers as high as 127. Despite maintenance of amplification for hundreds of generations, we observe no persistent mutations in any nanK duplicate at the level of resolution provided by 75X whole genome sequencing coverage. Our results demonstrate that gene sharing can alter the trajectory but not necessarily prevent the recruitment of a preferred promiscuous candidate during adaptive evolution when other, seemingly equal candidates are available. Our findings also reveal that evolution by Innovation-Amplification-Divergence may only be facilitated at moderate levels of gene amplification, and hindered by massive amplification, as increased gene copy number diminishes returns of individual adaptive point mutations. Classification: Evolution, Biochemistry SignificanceThe Innovation-Amplification-Divergence model posits that single multifunctional enzymes evolve into multiple monofunctional enzymes through two events: First, selective pressure on a multifunctional enzyme leads to a duplication of the gene encoding that enzyme in an organisms genome. Second, the duplicate gene copy can freely accumulate mutations that enhance one of the encoded enzymes functions while the original copy can accumulate mutations that enhance the enzymes other encoded function. Intriguingly, our results reveal sequence divergence only in cells that experience mild amplification, and no divergence in cells that experience massive amplification. This suggests that sequence divergence may be suppressed above a certain number of gene copies, providing a new perspective on a widely accepted theory of evolution.
Matching journals
The top 7 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Repeated losses of self-fertility shaped heterozygosity and polyploidy in yeast evolution 94%
- Population-level survey of loss-of-function mutations revealed that background dependent fitness genes are rare and functionally related in yeast 93%
- Pulsatile basal gene expression as a fitness determinant in bacteria 93%
Similar papers in this journal
- Determinants of multiheme cytochrome extracellular electron transfer uncovered by systematic peptide insertion 91%
- Activity Mapping the Acyl Carrier Protein - Elongating Ketosynthase Interaction in Fatty Acid Biosynthesis 90%
- The PqsE active site as a target for small molecule antimicrobial agents against Pseudomonas aeruginosa 90%
Similar papers in this journal
- Adaptation to mutational inactivation of an essential E. coli gene converges to an accessible suboptimal fitness peak. 94%
- Variation in the modality of a yeast signaling pathway is mediated by a single regulator 94%
- Selection on plastic adherence leads to hyper-multicellular strains and incidental virulence in the budding yeast 94%
Similar papers in this journal
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.