Back

Transfer potential of F-like plasmids in Escherichia coli differs by animal environment

Sundar, S.; Bonhoeffer, S.; Huisman, J. S.

2026-02-03 microbiology
10.64898/2026.02.02.703319 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Plasmids play a key role in the spread of virulence and antimicrobial resistance genes to new genetic backgrounds. Genetic variation in the transfer operon, the genes responsible for conjugation, can lead to substantial differences in transfer potential even between closely related plasmids. However, it is not clear how much genetic diversity there is in transfer operons of natural bacterial populations. Here, we analyze the prevalence and transfer potential of F-like plasmids, a clinically important family of plasmids in Enterobacteriaceae. Using 1200 Escherichia coli genomes isolated from three livestock-associated environments, we find that the fraction of F-like transfer operons that are functionally complete was significantly higher in poultry than in bovine and swine associated bacteria. This difference was not captured in methods that use the presence of replication genes to estimate plasmid prevalence. Confounders such as the phylogenetic relatedness of E. coli or the presence of antibiotic resistance could not explain these significant differences in transfer potential. Instead, it seems the poultry environment selects for plasmids with high transfer potential, as it also contained more conjugative plasmid types per isolate. While we find environment specific differences in overall plasmid frequency, patterns of transfer gene presence/absence were similar across the three environments. Regulatory and exclusion genes are the exception to this pattern, suggesting environment specific modulation of transfer rates. This highlights the use of genomic data to uncover environment specific differences in plasmid prevalence and transfer potential, revealing the selection pressures shaping horizontal gene transfer in these environments.

Matching journals

The top 4 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Microbial Genomics
204 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
25.5%
2
Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B
51 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
18.3%
3
mBio
750 papers in training set
Top 4%
4.2%
4
mSystems
361 papers in training set
Top 3%
3.9%
50% of probability mass above
5
Microbiology
57 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
3.9%
6
PLOS Genetics
756 papers in training set
Top 5%
3.5%
7
Molecular Biology and Evolution
488 papers in training set
Top 1%
3.5%
8
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 47%
2.4%
9
Genome Biology and Evolution
280 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
2.3%
10
mSphere
281 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.8%
11
Nucleic Acids Research
1128 papers in training set
Top 11%
1.7%
12
PLOS Pathogens
721 papers in training set
Top 6%
1.6%
13
Frontiers in Microbiology
375 papers in training set
Top 6%
1.5%
14
eLife
5422 papers in training set
Top 47%
1.3%
15
PLOS Biology
408 papers in training set
Top 13%
1.3%
16
Environmental Microbiology
119 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.2%
17
Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences
341 papers in training set
Top 5%
1.2%
18
Molecular Ecology
304 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.1%
19
FEMS Microbiology Ecology
47 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
1.1%
20
microLife
19 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
0.9%
21
Nature Communications
4913 papers in training set
Top 58%
0.9%
22
Molecular Microbiology
66 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
0.9%
23
Journal of Virology
456 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.8%
24
The ISME Journal
194 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.8%
25
Genes
126 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.7%
26
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 69%
0.7%
27
Microbiology Spectrum
435 papers in training set
Top 6%
0.7%
28
BMC Genomics
328 papers in training set
Top 7%
0.6%
29
Access Microbiology
22 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
0.6%
30
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
2130 papers in training set
Top 48%
0.6%