Open-State Dynamics and Allosteric Modulation of the α1β3γ2 GABAA Receptor Stabilized by L9'T/S Substitutions
Diyaolu, A.; Borghese, C. M.; Goldschen-Ohm, M. P.; Natesan, S.
Show abstract
GABA type A receptors (GABAARs) mediate inhibitory neurotransmission, and their dysfunction contributes to epilepsy, anxiety, and depression. Although closed and desensitized structures of heteropentameric GABAARs are known, an open-state conformation has been difficult to capture. Here we use in-silico mutagenesis and Gaussian-accelerated MD to stabilize open-like ensembles of the 1{beta}3{gamma}2 receptor via hydrophilic substitutions at the hydrophobic 9' gate (L9'T/L9'S). The mutants expand the pore at 9' and 20' (extracellular pore entry), increase hydration and water flux, and lower Cl- permeation barriers at 9' and -2' (desensitization gate) from [~]19/[~]9 kcal mol-{superscript 1} (WT) to [~]1.3-1.6/[~]3.0-3.4 kcal mol-1, yielding ohmic conductance [~]10-30 pS in computational electrophysiology. Conformationally, the mutants show reduced twist, outward M2 tilts, and C-loop closure, consistent with activation-like signatures. On this open-like background, PAMs (diazepam, ganaxolone) primarily tune the residual -2' constriction, whereas bicuculline (orthosteric antagonist) drives a time-ordered, bottom-to-top closing sequence (-2' first, then 9'/20', then twist) via an asymmetric collapse of the M2 bundle that approaches closed-state landmarks while sampling desensitized-like ECD-TMD coupling. Two-electrode voltage clamp confirms spontaneous activity in L9'T-containing receptors, supporting the mutant-stabilized open-like ensembles. These results provide a coherent atomistic framework for gating and allosteric modulation in 1{beta}3{gamma}2 GABAARs and establish a tractable, ligand-responsive platform for state-selective structure-based design.
Matching journals
The top 2 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
Similar papers in this journal
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.