Back

A Real-Time Functional Localization Method Based on Dynamic Connectivity for Coupled Brain Regions

Heukamp, N. J.; Moliadze, V.; Nees, F.

2026-02-04 neuroscience
10.64898/2026.02.02.703208 bioRxiv
Show abstract

In the rapidly growing field of dynamic connectivity (dyC)-based real-time functional magnetic resonance imaging (rtfMRI) neurofeedback training, participants receive feedback on the dynamical coupling of brain nodes based on real-time dynamic connectivity measurements between multiple regions-of-interest. Given the fundamental role of regions-of-interest in this context, their signal-to-noise-ratio is critical. In closely related activity-based rtfMRI neurofeedback, region-of-interest selection is guided by functional localization methods informed by the BOLD-signal during a functional localizer experiment conducted prior to neurofeedback. However, methods that account for dynamic coupling of multiple brain regions remain lacking. Here, we develop a method based on dynamic connectivity between two brain areas that aligns with conventional activity-based localization approaches and is applicable for rtfMRI-NF. The proposed pipeline adapts processing steps from activity-based methods and was successfully implemented in a dyC-informed neurofeedback study. We observed a significant increase in dyC signal-to-noise-ratio during the localizer experiment and the first three blocks of neurofeedback training. Importantly, dyC values also correlated with anxiodepressive symptom levels, serving as proof of sensitivity, as changes in dyC reflect not only task-related neural dynamics but also individual differences in anxiodepressive traits. Our findings demonstrate that functional localization methods can be extended to dynamic connectivity, improving rtfMRI feedback accuracy, and with evidence to serve as sensitive measure for emotional states. This approach may enable precise targeting of coupled brain regions in neurofeedback and holds potential for personalized clinical applications, with broader implications beyond neurofeedback discussed.

Matching journals

The top 2 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
NeuroImage
813 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
40.3%
2
Imaging Neuroscience
242 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
14.7%
50% of probability mass above
3
Human Brain Mapping
295 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
8.6%
4
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 22%
5.0%
5
IEEE Journal of Biomedical and Health Informatics
34 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
3.3%
6
Journal of Neuroscience Methods
106 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
2.1%
7
Frontiers in Neuroimaging
11 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
1.9%
8
NeuroImage: Clinical
132 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.7%
9
Frontiers in Neuroscience
223 papers in training set
Top 4%
1.7%
10
Network Neuroscience
116 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
1.7%
11
Frontiers in Psychiatry
83 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.5%
12
Communications Biology
886 papers in training set
Top 12%
1.4%
13
Nature Communications
4913 papers in training set
Top 54%
1.4%
14
Frontiers in Human Neuroscience
67 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.1%
15
Journal of Neural Engineering
197 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.9%
16
eLife
5422 papers in training set
Top 55%
0.8%
17
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 68%
0.7%
18
eneuro
389 papers in training set
Top 9%
0.7%
19
Aperture Neuro
18 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
0.7%
20
Magnetic Resonance in Medicine
72 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
0.7%
21
PLOS Biology
408 papers in training set
Top 24%
0.5%
22
Medical Image Analysis
33 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.5%
23
PLOS Computational Biology
1633 papers in training set
Top 28%
0.5%