Back

Iterative Extracellular Vesicle Protein Co-Expression Biomarker Refinement for Preoperative Classification of Histopathological Growth Patterns in Colorectal Liver Metastasis Patients

Martel, R.; Shen, M. L.; Tsamchoe, M. L.; Petrillo, S. K.; Lazaris, A.; Metrakos, P.; Juncker, D.

2026-02-04 bioengineering
10.64898/2026.02.02.702621 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Preoperative triage of colorectal liver metastases (CRCLM) by histopathological growth pattern (HGP)--angiogenesis-dependent desmoplastic (dHGP) and vessel co-opting replacement (rHGP)--could guide anti-angiogenic therapy, yet HGP scoring requires resected tissue. We present an extracellular vesicle (EV) inner and outer protein (EVPio) co-expression assay and iterative biomarker refinement for plasma-based HGP classification. We established a minimal, high-throughput plasma pre-processing workflow (low-speed centrifugation and 0.45 m filtration) with comparable EVPio assay performance to size-exclusion chromatography. We established an EV biomarker selection template with growing cohorts--feasibility (n = 3), pilot (n = 9), discovery (n = 67)--ranking candidate protein pairs by signal quality (SNR, CV), redundancy (inter-correlation/orthogonality), and HGP separation (effect size, significance, ROC). This process reduced an initial 19x18 capture/detection set to a focused 9x9 panel (81 co-expression pairs). In a 58-patient CRCLM subset (22 dHGP, 14 rHGP, 22 mixed), three pairs achieved high signal quality with significant differential expression across HGPs. A three-feature linear discriminant model yielded 75.9% cross-validated accuracy (AUC 0.77) for classifying pure dHGP vs. non-dHGP. The results show that co-expression signatures capture defining features of HGP biology while revealing heterogeneity. The proposed EV biomarker refinement template is generalizable and our results show that co-expression signatures capture defining features of HGP biology supporting efforts towards clinically actionable, HGP-driven therapeutic guidance.

Matching journals

The top 12 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Nature Communications
4913 papers in training set
Top 28%
6.5%
2
Advanced Science
249 papers in training set
Top 3%
6.4%
3
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 23%
4.9%
4
Communications Medicine
85 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
4.9%
5
npj Precision Oncology
48 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
4.9%
6
Cell Reports Medicine
140 papers in training set
Top 1%
4.0%
7
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 35%
4.0%
8
PLOS Computational Biology
1633 papers in training set
Top 9%
3.6%
9
npj Digital Medicine
97 papers in training set
Top 1%
3.6%
10
Communications Biology
886 papers in training set
Top 2%
3.3%
11
Nature Medicine
117 papers in training set
Top 1%
2.1%
12
Lab on a Chip
88 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
2.1%
50% of probability mass above
13
Nature Biomedical Engineering
42 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
2.1%
14
eLife
5422 papers in training set
Top 38%
1.9%
15
Bioengineering & Translational Medicine
21 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
1.9%
16
EMBO Molecular Medicine
85 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.7%
17
Science Advances
1098 papers in training set
Top 17%
1.7%
18
Med
38 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
1.5%
19
Computers in Biology and Medicine
120 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.3%
20
Computational and Structural Biotechnology Journal
216 papers in training set
Top 5%
1.3%
21
Small Methods
26 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
1.3%
22
Analytical Chemistry
205 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.0%
23
Cell Reports Methods
141 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.9%
24
Journal of Thrombosis and Haemostasis
28 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
0.9%
25
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
2130 papers in training set
Top 41%
0.9%
26
Frontiers in Immunology
586 papers in training set
Top 7%
0.8%
27
Science Translational Medicine
111 papers in training set
Top 5%
0.8%
28
Advanced Healthcare Materials
71 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.8%
29
Cancer Research
116 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.8%
30
BMC Medicine
163 papers in training set
Top 7%
0.7%