Back

Loss of PIK3CA allows in vitro growth but not in vivo progression of KRAS mutant lung adenocarcinoma in a syngeneic orthotopic implantation model

Booth, A. L.; Caso, G.; Rosati, B.; Jiang, Y.-P.; Zong, W.-X.; Lin, R. Z.; Bien, H.

2026-02-04 cancer biology
10.64898/2026.02.02.701385 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Constitutively active KRAS mutations are highly prevalent in lung cancers, but the direct role of its downstream phosphatidylinositol 3-kinase (PI3K) pathway in tumor progression remains unclear. A previous study established the requirement for PIK3CA, the alpha catalytic isoform, in lung tumor development in mouse models with an intact Trp53 tumor suppressor. In this study, we further investigated the requirement for PIK3CA for tumor growth both in vitro and in vivo. We first generated a "KPA" cell line by genetically deleting Pik3ca from a murine lung adenocarcinoma "KP" cell line harboring oncogenic KrasG12D and lacking Trp53. We found that Pik3ca is not required for cell survival and growth in vitro, even under anchorage-independent conditions but reduced the growth rate by 20%. We next orthotopically implanted KP and KPA cells into syngeneic mice and found that PIK3CA is absolutely required for tumor progression, even in the absence of Trp53. Implantation of KP cells, or a "KPS" cell line lacking the Stk11 gene, led to rapid tumor growth and death of all host animals. In contrast, mice implanted with KPA cells all survived with no detectable lung tumors. The gene expression profiles from cultured cell lines suggest KPA cells may be vulnerable to oxidative stress. Indeed, we found KPA cells were more sensitive to hydrogen peroxide and diethyl maleate-induced oxidative stress as compared to KP and KPS cells. Together, these results demonstrate that PIK3CA is not required for lung cancer cell growth induced by mutant KRAS in vitro but is critically needed for in vivo progression and growth.

Matching journals

The top 9 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 2%
14.5%
2
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 24%
7.3%
3
Molecular Oncology
50 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
6.4%
4
Disease Models & Mechanisms
119 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
4.9%
5
Cancers
200 papers in training set
Top 1%
4.9%
6
eLife
5422 papers in training set
Top 25%
3.6%
7
Oncogene
76 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
3.6%
8
Cell Reports
1338 papers in training set
Top 17%
3.1%
9
Molecular Cancer Research
42 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
2.1%
50% of probability mass above
10
Cancer Research
116 papers in training set
Top 1%
2.1%
11
Translational Oncology
18 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
1.9%
12
Oncotarget
15 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
1.8%
13
Cancer Letters
32 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.8%
14
mBio
750 papers in training set
Top 7%
1.7%
15
Frontiers in Oncology
95 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.7%
16
The FASEB Journal
175 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.7%
17
Nature Communications
4913 papers in training set
Top 54%
1.3%
18
International Journal of Cancer
42 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
1.2%
19
Redox Biology
64 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
1.2%
20
iScience
1063 papers in training set
Top 24%
1.0%
21
Cancer Research Communications
46 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
1.0%
22
EBioMedicine
39 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
0.9%
23
Cell Death & Disease
126 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.9%
24
JCI Insight
241 papers in training set
Top 6%
0.8%
25
Journal of Biological Chemistry
641 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.8%
26
Cell Death Discovery
51 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.8%
27
PLOS Genetics
756 papers in training set
Top 15%
0.8%
28
Clinical Cancer Research
58 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.8%
29
Biochimica et Biophysica Acta (BBA) - Molecular Cell Research
28 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
0.7%
30
Archives of Toxicology
14 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
0.7%