Back

Development Efficiency and Mortality After Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting: A National Causal Inference Analysis

Martins, G. K.; Botelho, A. D.; Consoli, L.; Teles Costa Grillo, I.; Passos, F. S.; Esper Treml, R.; Caldonazo, T.

2026-02-04 cardiovascular medicine
10.64898/2026.02.02.26345421 medRxiv
Show abstract

BackgroundWe evaluated whether development efficiency, the component of the Human Development Index independent of GDP per capita and income inequality, is associated with in-hospital mortality after coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) in Brazil, and whether this association is mediated by access to elective surgery. MethodsWe conducted a retrospective ecological panel study using administrative data on CABG hospitalizations within the Brazilian Unified Health System from 2008-2024. State-year observations were linked to socioeconomic indicators. Development efficiency was defined as the residual of HDI after regression on GDP per capita and the Gini coefficient. Associations with in-hospital mortality were examined using volume-weighted multilevel models. Absolute causal effects and mediation through urgency status were estimated using g-computation and parametric causal mediation analysis. ResultsThe final analytic panel included 379 state-year observations. A 1-standard deviation increase in development efficiency was associated with a reduction in predicted in-hospital mortality from 6.8% to 5.7% (absolute risk reduction -1.1 percentage points; p<0.001), corresponding to one death prevented for every 91 procedures. Mediation analysis indicated that 95.5% of the total effect was attributable to the natural direct effect, while only 4.5% was mediated through urgency status, with no significant indirect effect. ConclusionsDevelopment efficiency is an independent and clinically meaningful determinant of survival after CABG in Brazil. Higher income-independent HDI performance is associated with substantial absolute mortality reductions, driven predominantly by direct system-level pathways rather than changes in urgency profile. Strengthening health-system efficiency and perioperative capacity may therefore yield meaningful gains in cardiac surgical outcomes.

Matching journals

The top 6 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Journal of the American Heart Association
119 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
12.8%
2
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 15%
12.4%
3
Heart
10 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
10.2%
4
The American Journal of Cardiology
15 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
7.2%
5
Journal of Clinical Medicine
91 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
6.4%
6
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 17%
6.4%
50% of probability mass above
7
BMC Medicine
163 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
4.3%
8
BMJ Open
554 papers in training set
Top 6%
3.6%
9
Open Heart
19 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
2.9%
10
Frontiers in Cardiovascular Medicine
49 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.9%
11
European Journal of Preventive Cardiology
13 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
1.7%
12
American Journal of Preventive Medicine
11 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.7%
13
Healthcare
16 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
1.5%
14
BMJ
49 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
1.5%
15
International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health
124 papers in training set
Top 4%
1.5%
16
JMIR Medical Informatics
17 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
1.3%
17
International Journal of Cardiology
13 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
1.2%
18
Canadian Medical Association Journal
15 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.2%
19
PLOS Medicine
98 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.2%
20
Nature Communications
4913 papers in training set
Top 58%
1.0%
21
Systematic Reviews
11 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
1.0%
22
BMC Public Health
147 papers in training set
Top 5%
1.0%
23
Vaccine
189 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.8%
24
Circulation
66 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.8%
25
Circulation: Heart Failure
14 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
0.6%
26
Medicine
30 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.6%
27
BMJ Global Health
98 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.6%
28
PeerJ
261 papers in training set
Top 19%
0.5%
29
The Lancet Digital Health
25 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.5%
30
BMC Cardiovascular Disorders
14 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.5%