Back

Estimation of Heavy Metal Contamination in Selected Marine Fish in Bangladesh and Their Health Impact

Rahaman, M. A.; Jahan, I.; Alam, S. S.; Shill?, L. C.; Dihan, M. A. M.; Al Mamun, M. A.

2026-02-04 public and global health
10.64898/2026.02.02.26345413 medRxiv
Show abstract

BackgroundSea fish traditionally serves as a protein source and plays a crucial and indispensable role in providing nutrition for the people of Bangladesh. However, frequent consumption may potentially indicate health risks through contamination with toxic heavy metals. The main purpose of this study is to evaluate the levels of heavy metal concentrations (Cr, Fe, Ni, Mn, Cu, and Pb) in selected sea fish from Chattogram and Coxs Bazar districts in Bangladesh. MethodsA wet digestion technique was employed to prepare the samples for analyzing heavy metals. Atomic Absorption Spectrophotometry (AAS) in flame and furnace technique was utilized for the estimation of heavy metal content. The health risk of human was evaluated grounded on Estimated Daily Intake (EDI), Target Hazard Quotient (THQ), Total Target Hazard Quotient (TTHQ) or Hazard Index (HI), and Target Cancer Risk (CR). ResultThe descending chronology of average concentrations for the selected heavy metals was as follows: Fe (32.36) > Ni (12.12) > Pb (9.70) > Cu (7.29) > Mn (5.94) > Cr (5.22). The correlations (r0.587) between Cr and Mn were found significantly positive which indicated the parameters were interconnected with each other and likely have a common origin within the study area. EDI values of four samples in the case of Cr and six values for Pb exceeded the reference doses (RfD) which included Bombay Duck, Ilish, Silver Pomfret, Longfin Tuna, Indian Threadfin, and Bigeye Ilisha. In six sea fish samples, the THQ for Cr and Pb crossed the allowable limit of 1. The TTHQ/HI values for seven fish species were higher than 1 ranging from Bigeye Ilisha (3.25) to Indian Mackerel (1.35). The CR values for the majority of the heavy metals fell within an acceptable range. ConclusionsFrom a public health perspective, this study revealed that continuous consumption of heavy metals, resulting in non-oncogenic and oncogenic health implications as well.

Matching journals

The top 6 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 4%
26.9%
2
Environmental Research
46 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
7.1%
3
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 21%
5.0%
4
Science of The Total Environment
179 papers in training set
Top 2%
4.5%
5
PeerJ
261 papers in training set
Top 1%
4.3%
6
Environmental Pollution
35 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
3.7%
50% of probability mass above
7
Disaster Medicine and Public Health Preparedness
16 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
3.7%
8
Heliyon
146 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
3.2%
9
International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health
124 papers in training set
Top 2%
3.2%
10
The American Journal of Tropical Medicine and Hygiene
60 papers in training set
Top 1%
2.8%
11
Current Developments in Nutrition
15 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
2.0%
12
PLOS Global Public Health
293 papers in training set
Top 3%
2.0%
13
Data in Brief
13 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
1.8%
14
Cureus
67 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.8%
15
Applied Sciences
24 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
1.5%
16
Frontiers in Public Health
140 papers in training set
Top 5%
1.4%
17
PLOS Water
11 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.3%
18
Journal of Environmental Management
11 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
1.3%
19
Journal of Hazardous Materials
19 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
0.9%
20
Malaria Journal
48 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.8%
21
Archives of Clinical and Biomedical Research
28 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.8%
22
JMIRx Med
31 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.8%
23
Archives of Microbiology
11 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
0.8%
24
Microbiology Resource Announcements
22 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
0.8%
25
JMIR Public Health and Surveillance
45 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.8%
26
BMC Cancer
52 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.7%
27
Acta Tropica
13 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
0.7%
28
BMC Public Health
147 papers in training set
Top 6%
0.7%
29
Frontiers in Neurology
91 papers in training set
Top 6%
0.5%
30
Frontiers in Medicine
113 papers in training set
Top 8%
0.5%